>>107
I don't think our definitions of "logical thinking" match. I definitely was not "taught" logical thinking unless by logical thinking you mean things like "what is a Taylor series" or "what is long division".
No, man, I'm talking about this shit
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mathematical_logic that stands at the foundation of stuff like Taylor series and long division.
I kind of get it but my logic could still very well be illogical. For example I believe a micro-scale self-contradiction can cause a system to be less self-contradicting on a macro scale, and vice versa. But this is all just masturbation of course.
A system can't be contradictory. It just means one of your assumptions or your analysis of it is erroneous, and that causes you to perceive it as contradictory. I might not be understanding what you're saying, so please expand on this and possibly give an example.
What if it's not? If the facts don't fit the theory, change the facts.
I'm pretty sure you're supposed to change the theory and/or stare harder at the facts.
I like agreeing with people, I like "being one" with the world. But that could be the wrong way to think.
People are fucking retarded, I really recommend against agreeing with them easily.