Mockingbird
1
Name:
Anonymous
2013-03-05 14:55
Some languages don't really care about types and allow to write something like (define (w x) (x x))
or even worse stuff.
Are there any statically-typed languages that allow to mock the mockingbird?
41
Name:
Anonymous
2013-04-05 2:20
>>40
Please understand, I am not making fun of you. I am making fun of java.
42
Name:
Anonymous
2013-04-05 3:55
If it's java, it's shit.
If it's javascript, it's a turd.
43
Name:
Anonymous
2013-04-05 13:05
44
Name:
Anonymous
2013-04-05 15:02
mocking dubs
jajajajajaja XD
45
Name:
Anonymous
2013-04-05 23:59
>>44
>jajajajaja
Le unfunny beaner
46
Name:
Anonymous
2013-04-06 1:47
>>45
Le mainstream racism.
47
Name:
Anonymous
2013-04-06 12:07
To Mock a Mocking Nerd xD
48
Name:
Anonymous
2013-04-06 12:18
>>47
Stop le mocking me illogical shitstain
I FUCKING HATE YOU!!! DIE IN A FUCKING FIRE YOU COCK-SNIFFING ASS PIECE OF SHIT LE ANGLO ENCULER FAIRE SHIT SHIT PISS OUT MY ASS LE MOCKING ME AWFDS FSDFSDF ASSDAFDAFA DFJHG FGJSDFSFS ARGHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
49
Name:
Anonymous
2013-04-06 13:23
>>48
Typical anglophone monkey.
50
Name:
Anonymous
2013-04-06 13:49
I realized how to fix lisp and make it popular, ust change the notation to f(x,y,z) instead of (f x y z).
51
Name:
Anonymous
2013-04-06 13:56
>>50
define(reverse(l),
if(null?(l),
list(),
cons(reverse(cdr(l)),
car(l))))
pig disgusting
52
Name:
Anonymous
2013-04-06 14:02
>>51
It looks Prolog-ish.
53
Name:
Kim Jong Un
!!U+/WhdIY7jOc6fW
2013-04-06 14:04
no
54
Name:
Anonymous
2013-04-06 14:45
>>51
Symta:
reverse [X@Xs] = [@reverse.Xs X]
Lisp:
define(reverse(l),
if(null?(l),
list(),
cons(reverse(cdr(l)),
car(l))))
55
Name:
Anonymous
2013-04-06 15:26
reverse([],Acc,Acc).
reverse([X|Xs],Acc,Res) :- reverse(Xs,[X|Acc],Res).
reverse(Xs,Res) :- reverse(Xs,[],Res).
56
Name:
Anonymous
2013-04-06 16:19
Le lamduh calculus
Newer Posts