github

[spoiler/], why don't we ever share code and contribute patches? I think it would [spoiler/] a better place, don't you?

explicit pseudo anonymity is a down grade from inferable pseudo anonymity. We are also lazy, and can only produce fibs implementations.

However, I am considering starting https://dis.4chan.org/read/prog/1361556470/36-41,45

If I get a usable starting point for the engine, I will post what I have somehow.

Design:

1. User provides thread id.
2. Page is downloaded from shiichan
3. Page is parsed, posts extracted
4. >>N references are analyzed as replies and used to infer pseudo identities
5. Pseudo identities are assigned to loli characters in a school room.
6. OP loli walks up to group of other lolies, introduces herself as NAME if not Anonymous, and says Subject and Comment.
7. Lolies then speak to each other or to the group, using the >>N tags to direct speech at certain lolies.

Partial magic: Camera dynamically pans to capture the speaking loli and loli(es) being spoken to.
Very Magic: Content is analyzed for emotional content, be it anger, humor, etc. Tone is introduced into the speech synthesizer.
Very Very Magic: Add action and plot. Use more complex settings.

>>3
Fund it. This sounds amazing. This is how I'd like to read /prog/ from now until the end of time.

We're all playful loli faeries scheming against each other.

I'd help with the NLP parts, but how are you going to generate the voices? Synthesized speech still always sounds like nightmares. Unless we pipe it to Vocaloid or some shit. I suppose we should all learn Japanese then. Or do you know of a quality framework for this that I'm not aware of?

I had a TTS with a brummie accent once, would that help?

>>3
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_Comic_Chat

>>4
scheming
Are the Three Mischievous Fairies JEWish?

>>7
No, 馬鹿！ They program in Scheme.

>>6
David Kurlander
Likely Jewish. Because he comes from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Courland_Governorate

>>9
That makes it even better. I love JEWS.

>>10
Shalom, Hymie^!

>>11
I'm a JEW loving gentile. Are you a Muslim?

>>12
Whom are you trying to fool, Hymie?

>>13
Whom are you trying to fool, Mudslime?

I live in South Africa, and JEWS haven't reached these places yet (unfortunately).

http://dis.4chan.org/read/prog/1205888669/5

This shit worked in 2012 (but I won't bother finding the thread), so it should work now.

>>2
It's interesting how the unexamined Cult of Anonymous is stronger here than it is on the imageboards. And by interesting I mean pathetic.

>>16
Depends who you are. Fagshits from the imageboards might make it look that way, but I (for one) couldn't give a shit.

>>16
That's because Internet privacy and anonymity are essential civil rights.

>>18
I bet you own a Guy Fawkes mask. There's a pretty big leap from ``people should be able to be anonymous if they want to'' to ``everyone who isn't anonymous is wrong and dumb''.

>>16
It's a personal preference. I don't claim to lead or follow a cult. I welcome you to contribute your information to the international panopticon if that is what you want to use modern technology for.

>>19
everyone who isn't anonymous is wrong and dumb
I wouldn't say they are wrong, but I would say they are either misinformed or irrational if they aren't comfortable with being stalked.

>>19
Everyone who exposes their private life on the Internet is wrong and dumb.

>>20
Do some people actually enjoy being stalked?

>>22
Well, it used to be a rare and taboo thing a few years back, but now they've come out of the closet. Nowadays they have a discussion forum where they hang out at facebook.com

>>20
they are either misinformed or irrational if they aren't comfortable with being stalked.
Pretty much everyone is misinformed or irrational?

>>20-21
This is what I'm talking about. We're talking about getting a (possibly pseudonymous) Github account, not installing webcams in our bathrooms.

none has github account here because none programs

I do not understand git. I learned Visual Sourcesafe and that's all I'll ever need, so I'm not going to bother using anything else.

>>26
Actually my github account is johnsmith5

more like shithub

Finally, a way to complete SICP and become an EXPERT PROGRAMMER without any of the effort!
https://github.com/leon-huang/SICP-solutions

>>24
Well, there are three categories.

People that are not aware that their information is being collected and made available to parties they are not comfortable with being exposed to. These are the misinformed.

People that knowingly use services that expose information about them to parties they are not comfortable with, and they don't like, but they still continue to use the service. These are the irrational.

Then finally there are those that use services that expose information about them to other parties, but the user justifies their use of the service with a cost benefit analysis. For them the value of using the service is a stronger reward than the penalty of their information being passed on to other parties. They typically say things like "I have nothing to hide," or "It wont affect me in any way." They will sometimes also justify the all knowing nature of the other parties that are collecting information, often imagining that it is their government doing the collecting in the name of projection, despite the impossibility of knowing who they are or what their motivations could be.

in the name of protection
fixed

>>1
Why Github is Jewish?