number theorey and combonotorics
1
Name:
Anonymous
2013-02-21 18:03
Is there a generally accepted standard for learning number theory and combinatorics (like sicp is for programming)?
2
Name:
Anonymous
2013-02-21 18:04
What standard is there supposed to be? Don't you just learn these topics?
sicp is for programming
You sure get me, 6/10
3
Name:
Anonymous
2013-02-21 18:07
90% of what is covered in undergraduate classes can be found on wikipedia. I shit you not.
4
Name:
Anonymous
2013-02-21 18:14
>>3
/or/ in a public library, and I'm more of a book person. Suggestions?
5
Name:
Anonymous
2013-02-21 18:15
Does {} contain itself?
6
Name:
Anonymous
2013-02-21 18:19
7
Name:
Anonymous
2013-02-21 18:36
>>5
>>> {} in {}
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
TypeError: unhashable type: 'dict'
8
Name:
Anonymous
2013-02-21 20:01
9
Name:
Anonymous
2013-02-21 20:22
{} is the empty set and therefore does not "contain".
10
Name:
Anonymous
2013-02-21 20:25
>>9
it contains nothing, e.g. the empty set
11
Name:
Anonymous
2013-02-21 22:51
>>10
The empty set is not nothing. It's the set that contains nothing. Like an empty bag if you will.
12
Name:
Anonymous
2013-02-21 23:51
Does the empty set contain the empty set?
13
Name:
Anonymous
2013-02-21 23:57
14
Name:
Anonymous
2013-02-22 0:10
>>12
But the empty set is a subset of the empty set.
15
Name:
Brackeption
2013-02-22 4:49
{{}}
16
Name:
Anonymous
2013-02-22 8:00
17
Name:
Anonymous
2013-02-22 8:33
>>14
And then he was
enlightened
18
Name:
Anonymous
2013-02-22 8:38
(1) ∈ ℕ and (1) ⊂ ℕ
19
Name:
Anonymous
2013-02-22 8:39
Every set has itself and the empty set as subsets.
If {} was a prime number it'd be 1, the primest number.
20
Name:
Anonymous
2013-02-22 9:03
>>18
You should look up the difference between set membership and subset relations.
21
Name:
Anonymous
2013-02-22 9:17
22
Name:
Anonymous
2013-02-22 9:45
I remember an individual who used to come here who wasn't too skilled in set theory ^__^
23
Name:
Anonymous
2013-02-22 9:59
JEWS
JEWS
JEWS
24
Name:
Anonymous
2013-02-22 12:24
>>22
Awesome, thank you.
Also "⇒ implies" so /that's/ where that came from!
25
Name:
Anonymous
2013-02-22 12:26
>>24
Uh, what? Back to /g/, please.
26
Name:
sage
2013-02-22 12:46
>>4
If you live in a first class country (not America) you can feel free to stroll right into any university library of your choice and pick your selection of PhD dissertations and class literature in the subject that interests you.
27
Name:
Anonymous
2013-02-22 12:57
>>26
Canada is in America.
28
Name:
Anonymous
2013-02-22 13:11
>>27
Fuck off shitskin. You are an idiot.
29
Name:
Anonymous
2013-02-22 14:23
>>28
We're not shitskinned here in Canada, retard.
30
Name:
Anonymous
2013-02-22 15:00
>>29
Yes you are. Especially Québec.
31
Name:
Anonymous
2013-02-22 15:17
>>30
fucking kruennicks man
32
Name:
Anonymous
2013-02-22 16:14
>>27
He meant USA, faggot.
Newer Posts