>>20
A police officer is part of the state police apparatus and is bound by the terms of the constitution, as his station's authority is merely a delegation of state authority. Or, more precisely, he cannot act with more authority than the what the state has, because he is a police officer.
But I'm fairly certain
>>4 was making a general comment on all the uninformed crap that the savage negroid beast was claiming was unconstitutional. I also think that this is why he used a period ("."), so that it would be clear that the idea of the previous sentence was separate from that of the next.