/prog/ - libisp — World4ch

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-01 17:59

I dedicate this barely useful piece of junk program to /prog/

https://github.com/SirDzstic/libisp

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-01 18:06

I had a job as a garbage collector once, once.

Name: OP 2013-02-01 19:33

>>2
Did they pay you well? I'm considering my options for a new career.

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-01 20:17

>>1
C/C++
Go away.

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-01 20:30

>>4
You talking shit about C, kike?

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-01 20:42

>>5 you writing any good code?
Oh wait, you like C, guess not, my mistake.

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-01 20:47

When your hammer is C, everything looks like a thumb.

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-01 21:01

>>7
Exactly. Glad I know Java, it's quality.

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-01 21:03

>>7
>>8
Shalom!

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-01 21:23

>>8
Java is an inflatable hammer.

>>9
You are a tiny little man with a lot of hatred. I am so sorry for you.

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-01 21:25

>>10
Shalom!

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-01 21:33

Shalom! Shalom! Shalom! Shalom! Shalom! Shalom! Shalom! Shalom! Shalom! Shalom! Shalom! Shalom! Shalom! Shalom! Shalom! Shalom! Shalom! Shalom! Shalom! Shalom! Shalom! Shalom! Shalom! Shalom! Shalom! Shalom! Shalom! Shalom! Shalom! Shalom! Shalom! Shalom! Shalom! Shalom! Shalom! Shalom! Shalom! Shalom! Shalom! Shalom! Shalom! Shalom! Shalom! Shalom! Shalom! Shalom! Shalom! Shalom! Shalom! Shalom! Shalom! Shalom! Shalom! Shalom! Shalom! Shalom! Shalom! Shalom! Shalom! Shalom! Shalom! Shalom! Shalom! Shalom! Shalom! Shalom! Shalom! Shalom! Shalom! Shalom! Shalom! Shalom! Shalom! Shalom! Shalom! Shalom! Shalom! Shalom! Shalom! Shalom! Shalom! Shalom! Shalom! Shalom! Shalom! Shalom! Shalom! Shalom! Shalom! Shalom! Shalom! Shalom! Shalom!

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-01 21:38

S̨̫̗̥̤̘͍ͣ̅̑͑̚ẖ̗̑ͧͦ̕͞a̗̞͉̖̘̼̞ͫ͌ͨͯ͗lͤ̅̔͒ͯ̈́̉҉͓͈̖̪o̹͎̗͙̰̭̓͌ͥͩ̃̆̍͜m͕͈̲͇̹͈̔̇͑̕̕ͅ ̛̬̰͋͢͠H̝̗̬͚̳̪ͮͯ̇̋͠y̯̞͕͈͛̿́́ṃ̮͍̖̠͉̜͒̚iͯͩ̓̉͑̓̚҉̗͍̗̥͈e̸̦̬̼̲̝͒̑ͤ͌ͫ̍!̷̴̙͚̼ͯͣͪͨ̓̒

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-01 21:55

>>11-13
Does that make you feel better?

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-01 21:58

>>14
Let him be. He'll forget about it soon.

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-01 22:01

>>14
Shalom!
>>15
No. Shalom!

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-01 22:38

>>16 is the shell of what once used to be a human, now reduced to a vessel of hatred.

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-01 22:40

S̨̫̗̥̤̘͍ͣ̅̑͑̚ẖ̗̑ͧͦ̕͞a̗̞͉̖̘̼̞ͫ͌ͨͯ͗lͤ̅̔͒ͯ̈́̉҉͓͈̖̪o̹͎̗͙̰̭̓͌ͥͩ̃̆̍͜m͕͈̲͇̹͈̔̇͑̕̕ͅ ̛̬̰͋͢͠H̝̗̬͚̳̪ͮͯ̇̋͠y̯̞͕͈͛̿́́ṃ̮͍̖̠͉̜͒̚iͯͩ̓̉͑̓̚҉̗͍̗̥͈e̸̦̬̼̲̝͒̑ͤ͌ͫ̍!̷̴̙͚̼ͯͣͪͨ̓̒

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-01 23:33

in the future i think you should write your lisp evaluators in lisp like sussman did

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-01 23:33

oh fuck i forgot to sage that

Name: sage 2013-02-02 8:27

>>20
Sage goes in all fields.

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-02 9:05

Huh. Code Looks rather similar to this:
https://github.com/sdevlin/yoshi

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-02 9:07

>>22
Fuck, not the code. The project.

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-02 11:51

>>22,23

Quite surprising, considering the completely different purposes of these projects.

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-02 13:21

>>22
As a black hacker, I am offended by this post.

Name: 4ct !3lWjo8kf8k 2013-02-02 13:23

I really love listening to your little piss-ant soldiers trying to talk tough. They make me laugh. If Matrix was here, he'd laugh too.

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-02 13:29

>>26
Good to know, I guess.

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-02 13:47

>>26
Shalom!

Name: OP 2013-02-02 14:20

>>25
Could you please elaborate?

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-02 14:40

>>29
no

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-02 14:44

I only just found an actual use for a closure and it's probably much less efficient than its nested-define equivalent

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-02 14:48

>>31

A lambda within a particular lexical scope is equivalent to a reference to a function defined within the same lexical scope. Learn you compilers.

Name: sagewank 2013-02-02 14:54

>>32
Fuck your anus

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-02 15:02

>>33

I could write a program that generates more creative comebacks than yours. But in any case, they don't hide your incompetence, and only expose your lack of maturity.

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-02 15:04

>>34
write an anus

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-02 15:05

>>34
You must feel really proud of your wit against some apathetic guy over the internet

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-02 15:14

>>36
While I am somewhat frustrated by the apathetic guy's lack of motivation to improve their knowledge on closures, I am unaffected by any transaction of wit, and hold no desire for my words to leave any impact other than progression towards enlightenment.

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-02 15:32

>>37
You assume that efficiency is just a measure of the speed of the generated code, excluding the time and mental effort required to form (and no doubt eventually unwind) the thing in the first place.

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-02 15:34

>>37
Also "Learn your compilers." is condescending and ultimately counterproductive as it leads to fruitless exchanges such as this

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-02 15:36

>>38

You assume that efficiency is just a measure of the speed of the generated code,

That is the usual meaning, yes.

excluding the time and mental effort required to form (and no doubt eventually unwind) the thing in the first place.

These metric are usually referred to with terms like easy to read, easy to write, etc.

libisp

1 Name: Anonymous 2013-02-01 17:59

2 Name: Anonymous 2013-02-01 18:06

3 Name: OP 2013-02-01 19:33

4 Name: Anonymous 2013-02-01 20:17

5 Name: Anonymous 2013-02-01 20:30

6 Name: Anonymous 2013-02-01 20:42

7 Name: Anonymous 2013-02-01 20:47

8 Name: Anonymous 2013-02-01 21:01

9 Name: Anonymous 2013-02-01 21:03

10 Name: Anonymous 2013-02-01 21:23

11 Name: Anonymous 2013-02-01 21:25

12 Name: Anonymous 2013-02-01 21:33

13 Name: Anonymous 2013-02-01 21:38

14 Name: Anonymous 2013-02-01 21:55

15 Name: Anonymous 2013-02-01 21:58

16 Name: Anonymous 2013-02-01 22:01

17 Name: Anonymous 2013-02-01 22:38

18 Name: Anonymous 2013-02-01 22:40

19 Name: Anonymous 2013-02-01 23:33

20 Name: Anonymous 2013-02-01 23:33

21 Name: sage 2013-02-02 8:27

22 Name: Anonymous 2013-02-02 9:05

23 Name: Anonymous 2013-02-02 9:07

24 Name: Anonymous 2013-02-02 11:51

25 Name: Anonymous 2013-02-02 13:21

26 Name: 4ct !3lWjo8kf8k 2013-02-02 13:23

27 Name: Anonymous 2013-02-02 13:29

28 Name: Anonymous 2013-02-02 13:47

29 Name: OP 2013-02-02 14:20

30 Name: Anonymous 2013-02-02 14:40

31 Name: Anonymous 2013-02-02 14:44

32 Name: Anonymous 2013-02-02 14:48

33 Name: sagewank 2013-02-02 14:54

34 Name: Anonymous 2013-02-02 15:02

35 Name: Anonymous 2013-02-02 15:04

36 Name: Anonymous 2013-02-02 15:05

37 Name: Anonymous 2013-02-02 15:14

38 Name: Anonymous 2013-02-02 15:32

39 Name: Anonymous 2013-02-02 15:34

40 Name: Anonymous 2013-02-02 15:36

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-01 17:59

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-01 18:06

Name: OP 2013-02-01 19:33

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-01 20:17

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-01 20:30

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-01 20:42

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-01 20:47

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-01 21:01

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-01 21:03

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-01 21:23

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-01 21:25

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-01 21:33

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-01 21:38

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-01 21:55

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-01 21:58

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-01 22:01

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-01 22:38

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-01 22:40

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-01 23:33

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-01 23:33

Name: sage 2013-02-02 8:27

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-02 9:05

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-02 9:07

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-02 11:51

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-02 13:21

Name: 4ct !3lWjo8kf8k 2013-02-02 13:23

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-02 13:29

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-02 13:47

Name: OP 2013-02-02 14:20

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-02 14:40

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-02 14:44

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-02 14:48

Name: sagewank 2013-02-02 14:54

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-02 15:02

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-02 15:04

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-02 15:05

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-02 15:14

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-02 15:32

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-02 15:34

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-02 15:36