Scheme/DrRacket

How do I do this without using lambda but only using local and abstract list functions?

Type Student:

;; A student is a list of the form (list id cav passed failed),
;; where
;; id is a natural number (the student id number)
;; cav is a number between 0 and 100, inclusive (student's cumulative
;; average)
;; passed is a non-negative number (number of credits student has passed) ;; failed is a non-negative number (number of credits student has failed)

Question:
Write a function candidates that consumes a list of student lists and produces a list of id numbers for students in first year whose strong academic performance makes them candidates for a university scholarship. All students who meet the following criteria are candidates:
• students are in first year (i.e. passed + failed <= 6.0 units),
• passed >= 4.5 units,
• no courses have been failed, and
• cav is at least 90% or is at least 10% higher than the average of all first year students in the list.
The produced list must be in the same relative order as the consumed list.
For example,

(candidates
   (list (list 9898 54.7 6.5 0) (list 1234 83.7 6 0)
         (list 1140 57.9 5 0.5) (list 2311 68.5 5.5 0.5)
         (list 6708 61.5 3 0.75)))
   => (list 1234)

Graph search edges Facebook toward becoming a bit exploitative, even embarrassing: witness Gizmodo’s piece with women who appear as results for “Women who like sucking dicks.” More than likely, those women “liked” that particular activity as a joke and didn’t expect it to be seen by anyone other than their friends or maybe they left their profiles open and someone pranked them by discreetly adding the term to their interests.
Without making excuses for those women, who are probably regretting their ignorance of privacy settings and good security practices, graph search removes the context when something appears in someone’s profile.

Arse Technica, the liberal technonews outlet, at its best.  They forbade themselves from allowing thoughts like ``maybe some women actually like sucking dicks?'' because such thoughts are not feminist or empowering.  Yuck.