>>14
Oh for sure they will. But in what way? There seems to be significant disagreement between the various implementers about how the side issues should get done, even if they agree that "something" should be done. Which is exactly why R6RS caused the problems it did.
But in my view as a user, not someone making a scheme distribution, that's the SRFIs solved (mostly). Making a come one come all standard would be fine if we needed portable scheme. Do we really need portable scheme?
I just use Racket anyway!