Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

WCIT-12

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-06 20:21

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Telecommunication_Union#World_Conference_on_International_Telecommunications_2012_.28WCIT-12.29

The ITU will facilitate the The World Congress on International Telecommunications or WCIT, a treaty-level conference that addresses the international rules for telecommunications, including international tariffs.[11] The previous conference to update the International Telecommunication Regulations (ITRs) was held in Melbourne in 1988.[12] The next conference is taking place in Dubai in December 2012.

[...]

In August 2012, ITU called for a public consultation on a draft document ahead of the conference.[13] It is claimed the proposal would allow government restriction or blocking of information disseminated via the internet and create a global regime of monitoring internet communications – including the demand that those who send and receive information identify themselves. It would also allow governments to shut down the internet if there is the belief that it may interfere in the internal affairs of other states or that information of a sensitive nature might be shared.[14]

[...]

Proposals currently under consideration would establish regulatory oversight by the U.N. over security, fraud, traffic accounting as well as traffic flow, management of Internet Domain Names and IP addresses, and other aspects of the Internet that are currently governed either by community-based approaches such as Regional Internet Registries, ICANN, or largely national regulatory frameworks.[17] The move by the ITU and some countries has alarmed many within the United States and within the Internet community.[18][19] Indeed some European telecommunication services have proposed a so-called "sender pays" model which would requires sources of Internet traffic to pay destinations, similar to the way funds are transferred between countries using the telephone.[20][21]

The WCIT-12 activity has been attacked by Google, who has characterized it as a threat to the "free and open internet".[22]

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-09 18:55

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-09 19:01

>>81
did you even read that page?

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-09 19:46

>>1-1000
Back to Reddit, ``please''.

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-09 20:08

>>83
fuck you faggot

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-09 20:18

>>82
The point is that while the justice system is fallible, the doctrine of reasonable doubt applies to cases that potentially involve the death penalty. When it can be shown that there's a reasonable doubt that the accused did their alleged crime, the penalty of death shouldn't become a factor anymore. In order to get a judgement for death, the evidence has to show guilt beyond reasonable doubt. To get a judgement for this is no easy feat. It means that there can only be one interpretation of the events that led to the crime. If there any other possible interpretation given the facts, then it can also be shown that there is reasonable doubt.

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-09 20:46

>>85
And despite all that, innocent people still got murdered by their tender loving state. Fucking trials how do they work?

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-09 20:58

>>86
[Citation needed]. What evidence is there to suggest these people were not guilty as charged?

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-09 21:59

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-09 22:32

>>88
There's a perverted pleasure I gain from seeing people get disproved by wikipedia links.

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-09 22:39

>>88
The reason why these people were exonerated was because of advances in medical science that give society more tools uncover evidence. We can now use these same techniques for evidence for anybody facing the death penalty today. This means the false positive rate for the death penalty reduces even further and that people who do deserve it are more likely to get it (when they are caught).

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-09 22:47

>>90
The reason why these people were exonerated was because of advances in medical science that give society more tools uncover evidence. We can now use these same techniques for evidence for anybody facing the death penalty today.
That's good to know. I suppose that since the false positive rate is now exactly zero, that's why we stopped funding forensic science research. Oh wait.

people who do deserve
Deserve? Says who? Your Daddy up in the sky (who is actually terribly inefficient at giving people what they ``deserve'')? You? Paranoid single mother who lives next door? The victim's relatives? The killer's relatives?

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-10 0:06

>>91
What are you talking about? What does funding have to do with this? What does my daddy have to do with this? My daddy is in the ground, not the sky.

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List