/prog/ - C++ is not back

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-02 11:40

http://simpleprogrammer.com/2012/12/01/why-c-is-not-back/

Some interesting points about C++. I think next version of C++ should remove 80% of the language.

And no, C is not an option. Lack of RAII and other "advanced" functionalities will result in terrible bugs.

And no, D is not proper replacement. GC is shit.

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-02 14:26

[quote]Email me
var emailAddress = new StringBuilder("john.sonmez"); emailAddress.Append("@gmail.com"); emailAddress.ToString();[/quote]
Stopped reading right there.

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-02 15:00

>>2
Please learn to quote, Reddit fa/g/shit.

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-02 15:41

I think next version of C++ should remove 80% of the language.
C++ will only expand.

And no, C is not an option.
Yes it is.

Lack of RAII and other "advanced" functionalities will result in terrible bugs.
r u avin a giggle ``m8''?

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-02 15:44

^{(javascript is superior OOP)>} ᕦ(ò_óˇ)ᕤ

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-02 16:25

>>4
Yes it is.
Hah, C is only good for kernel development.

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-02 16:27

>>6
Why do you say that C is only good for kernel development?

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-02 16:28

>>7
What is kernal?

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-02 16:28

>>7
Because he/she is shit as fuck.

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-02 16:34

>>9
Why do you think that he/she is shit as fuck?

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-02 16:35

>>9
Is it because he/she is shit as fuck that you post here?

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-02 18:37

>>2
Mairu me
hayaku kudasai watachi
itsumo matteru

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-03 0:18

>>7
Because C++ is better for anything else.

Actually, C++ is better even for kernel development.

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-03 0:37

>>13
Actually, C++ is better even for kernel development.
Which is why there are so many well known, production quality kernels written in C++...

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-03 0:41

>>14
C++ code is faster than equivalent C.

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-03 2:12

>>15
That doesn't make any sense since c++ is a super set of c, and every feature provided in c++ can be expressed in c, in a variety of ways. c++ can only implement its features in only so many ways, and it must do it in a way that can also be done in c.

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-03 2:18

>>12

>Mairu me

you mean mail me or marry me?

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-03 3:43

>>16
Sorry, this isn't the 90s anymore.

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-03 4:05

>>18
That doesn't make any sense since both c++ and c have barely changed at all since the 90s. You see, programming languages are not like hardware, where people invent new methods to get better performing equipement subject to the restrictions of physics. Programming languages are subject to the restriction of human thought. This is why they cannot progress. It's because of people like you. I hope you are happy.

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-03 5:03

>>13
3/10, ``faggot''

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-03 5:16

I enjoy throwing objects whenever I am upset, that's why I enjoy C++ using exceptions

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-03 8:06

>>14
The Windows NT kernel is pretty popular...

The big objections to C++ are poor tools, the runtime requirements, and too complex language features. The first (and partly the second) stem from the mid-90s and have been largely solved by now. The second and third are usually handled by allowing only a subset of the language, but especially with the third you always get some self-titled expert timewaster who insist on using every feature even though they don't understand it themselves.

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-03 8:14

>>22
And all this nonsense is solved by simply not using C++!

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-03 8:16

>>22
Also, the Windows NT kernel is written in a shitty MICROSOFT QUALITY dialect of C, not C++.

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-03 8:24

>>22
It is popular and it is written in C

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-03 8:41

>>2
This.

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-03 21:37

>>22
(poor tools, partly the runtime requirements) have been largely solved by now
using only a subset of the language
RUBY AS FUCK tools, imprecise analyzers, undefined ABI

lel

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-03 22:44

C++ is definitely the best language for large, important software. Chances are you'll run into performance or ``scalability'' problems with shitlanguages like ``.NET Enterprise Beans''. 90% of programming, however, is not large and not important, so go ahead and use whatever you want.

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-03 22:50

>>28
No way,PUNK

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-03 22:53

since every soft which matters is written in c++.. your browser, your os, the game you installed on your hard drive etc etc >>28 is right

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-03 23:41

>>30
My browser is written in C, my OS is written in C, and the games I have installed are written in C, Java, Python, Scheme, assembly, and Inform.
Where is your Sepples now?

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-03 23:49

>>31
the games I have installed are written in C, Java, Python, Scheme, assembly

lol

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-03 23:51

>>31
Which OS, which browser, and which games?

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-04 0:25

>>33
Every OS. Even the NT kernel is written in C.
And I can't speak for >>31-kun, but I do most of my browsing with w3m.

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-04 0:42

>>33
Minix, w3m, Zork and several reimplementations of Pac-Man and Tetris.

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-04 0:55

>>35
>MINIX
>LE LLEEEEELLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-04 0:58

>>34
the nt kernel is written in c++ and assembly dipshit. all of windows is written in c++.

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-04 2:41

kernel may be written in c but most part of every os is written in c++ anyway

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-04 2:43

w3m is cute but it doesn't support javascript -_-

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-04 2:53

>LE EJPIN JPRO
>LE KAWAI LE DESU
>MY TOUHOU FACE

C++ is not back

1 Name: Anonymous 2012-12-02 11:40

2 Name: Anonymous 2012-12-02 14:26

3 Name: Anonymous 2012-12-02 15:00

4 Name: Anonymous 2012-12-02 15:41

5 Name: Anonymous 2012-12-02 15:44

6 Name: Anonymous 2012-12-02 16:25

7 Name: Anonymous 2012-12-02 16:27

8 Name: Anonymous 2012-12-02 16:28

9 Name: Anonymous 2012-12-02 16:28

10 Name: Anonymous 2012-12-02 16:34

11 Name: Anonymous 2012-12-02 16:35

12 Name: Anonymous 2012-12-02 18:37

13 Name: Anonymous 2012-12-03 0:18

14 Name: Anonymous 2012-12-03 0:37

15 Name: Anonymous 2012-12-03 0:41

16 Name: Anonymous 2012-12-03 2:12

17 Name: Anonymous 2012-12-03 2:18

18 Name: Anonymous 2012-12-03 3:43

19 Name: Anonymous 2012-12-03 4:05

20 Name: Anonymous 2012-12-03 5:03

21 Name: Anonymous 2012-12-03 5:16

22 Name: Anonymous 2012-12-03 8:06

23 Name: Anonymous 2012-12-03 8:14

24 Name: Anonymous 2012-12-03 8:16

25 Name: Anonymous 2012-12-03 8:24

26 Name: Anonymous 2012-12-03 8:41

27 Name: Anonymous 2012-12-03 21:37

28 Name: Anonymous 2012-12-03 22:44

29 Name: Anonymous 2012-12-03 22:50

30 Name: Anonymous 2012-12-03 22:53

31 Name: Anonymous 2012-12-03 23:41

32 Name: Anonymous 2012-12-03 23:49

33 Name: Anonymous 2012-12-03 23:51

34 Name: Anonymous 2012-12-04 0:25

35 Name: Anonymous 2012-12-04 0:42

36 Name: Anonymous 2012-12-04 0:55

37 Name: Anonymous 2012-12-04 0:58

38 Name: Anonymous 2012-12-04 2:41

39 Name: Anonymous 2012-12-04 2:43

40 Name: Anonymous 2012-12-04 2:53

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-02 11:40

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-02 14:26

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-02 15:00

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-02 15:41

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-02 15:44

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-02 16:25

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-02 16:27

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-02 16:28

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-02 16:28

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-02 16:34

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-02 16:35

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-02 18:37

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-03 0:18

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-03 0:37

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-03 0:41

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-03 2:12

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-03 2:18

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-03 3:43

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-03 4:05

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-03 5:03

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-03 5:16

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-03 8:06

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-03 8:14

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-03 8:16

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-03 8:24

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-03 8:41

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-03 21:37

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-03 22:44

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-03 22:50

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-03 22:53

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-03 23:41

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-03 23:49

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-03 23:51

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-04 0:25

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-04 0:42

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-04 0:55

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-04 0:58

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-04 2:41

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-04 2:43

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-04 2:53