Fascism rises like a fenix

The Marxists, Communists, Anarchists, Egalitarian Socialists, Liberals and Progressives of the world carry out violent protests, riots, victimology, and campaigns of division and destruction along racial/gender/cultural lines.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vqUbPAmFPKg
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EG0KQbRYkW8
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q6zIX29HkSo

Meanwhile, the National Socialists in Greece are giving out food to the poor, desperate, jobless and disillusioned ethnic Greek people.

Which group do you think is going to win out in the long run?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nSLYGZZVxrU

Soon, the Jews will realize their hour of judgement has come.

Zlatna Zora

>>1
Socialists versus Socialists?
If either side wins, we all lose.

bump

>>3
I don't want my precious taxes to be used to feed, clothe or help those disgusting poor people

>>5
Shalom!

>>5
Taxation is theft. I refuse to give my hard-earned money to a bunch of wealthy bankers and lawyers for them to try to soothe their guilty consciences by ``helping'' lazy people by giving them more money than I make.

>>6
Racist imbecilic child, tsk.

>>7
That is so full of fallacies I don't even know where to begin.  If your money is truly hard-earned, it's probably not a lot, and it is way less than what the {bank,lawy}ers are making.  So why not instate a nonlinear taxation scheme such that you don't pay a lot of taxes (because you don't have that much anyway), and make the high-income {bank,lawy}ers pay a lot more (quadratically or exponentially, even), huh?

Also, as both a lazy person and an eternal student, thanks for paying off my studies forever.

Nazism is just Marxism for the hateful. How about letting people be free. If that means the lazy will have to strain themselves, some drug abusers will go without a fix, some people will have to avoid breeding 20 offspring, or governments must seek peaceful resolution in lieu of war, then so be it.

So why not instate a nonlinear taxation scheme such that you don't pay a lot of taxes (because you don't have that much anyway), and make the high-income {bank,lawy}ers pay a lot more (quadratically or exponentially, even), huh?
Those {bank,lawy}ers just add the taxes onto the fees that they charge for their ``services'', which business owners pass on to their customers in increased prices. Making bread and milk more expensive hurts the poor a lot more than it hurts the wealthy.