Dynamic language

http://ro-che.info/ccc/images/typing.png

When do you ever need dynamism? When do you ever need monkey-patching, eval, heterogeneous collections, and shit like this?

>>21
That syntax is a misfeature. Any time you refer to built-in operators, it should be by function name instead of special syntax. Otherwise it's not explicit what you're doing.

>>32
What do you think this is? ALGOL 66? Get lost.