Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

JIDF-4chan Dialogue!

Name: The Real JIDF 2012-11-03 2:52

Hello 4chan! Hershall, actual JIDF member here (http://i.imgur.com/zpgjp.jpg). We have been discussing this site on our boards for some time and we understand we get some negative coverage on this site. Today I am reaching out to you on behalf of the JIDF to put aside our differences and form an alliance, as well as to clear up any misunderstandings. Ask me any questions you have.

Our main points are this. Muslims pose an existential threat to both Western culture and us Jews. We should unite against this very serious, dedicated common enemy, before they conquer both of us. Muslims have sympathizers among your ranks who use divide and conquer tactics to divide us as natural allies: their favourite tactic is anti-semitism. You might think the Nazis are your allies but they are actually Muslim sympathizers. Hitler was a Muslim lover himself, and by using constant anti-semitism as a platform, the Nazis/WN types are covering up their secret alliance with the Muslims and further dividing those of us who see Israel as the bullwark of western culture against the Muslim threat.

Therefore we invite you to join our boards so that we can work together against our common enemies. You will get no where with Nazis except hearing the same old tired slogans over and over again. On our boards, we promote active political engagement and discussion. You don't have to be Jewish to join us, we already have many non-Jews who support our efforts.

That's my spiel, now let's discuss and talk.

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-03 17:16

>>80
through force
Oh, man. You actually believe so? Listen, when I've said that I want to crush your freeze peach under my feminist man-in-drag heels, it's what we humans call satire, of your own retarded fears.

I think you may be autistic, if you can't catch on to those things. Take it as a suggestion, there's nothing to be ashamed of in such a condition.

Save when, you know, you make an ass of yourself online. A little shame would then be warranted.

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-03 17:24

>>79
I think I already ``proved'' that you are an asshole.

I don't see how the existence of transsexual people disproves the statement that gender isn't biological, it seems to rather prove it.

Who said it wasn't biological? What you claim is that it's wholly a social construct. Their compulsion and confirmed brain differences tell me otherwise.

And as I said, I'm out of here. Special olympics and all that, if it isn't too ableist of me to say so.

[b]Ahmed[b], Benito, please carry on.

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-03 17:29

>>81
Okay, so what your statement is then is that public (i.e. in the company of strangers) usage of various slurs like nigger and faggot should be looked down upon because it may reinforce some retards' ass-backwards beliefs (because there's no way of knowing whether among all of those strangers, one of them isn't a closet racist/homophobe)?  If such is that case, and you do not see inherent issue with private (i.e. among people who know each other sufficiently well to have determined that none are bigoted idiots) usage of such words, nor do you see an issue with their usage in humour (although probably best prefixed with a disclaimer like ``now I'm going to imitate a racist retard''), then we're actually violently agreeing.

of your own retarded fears.
The recent idiotic anti-islam video incident was all it took for a lot of people to start saying that absolute freedom of expression is bad; I think my fears are quite warranted.

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-03 17:34

>>82
Their compulsion and confirmed brain differences tell me otherwise.
Maybe gender-as-a-purely-cultural-thing + brain-differences = transsexual.

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-03 18:41

>>83
``Absolute'' freedom of expression is bad, you infantile mongoloid, and isn't a right anywhere. You already don't have the right to shout fire in a movie theater.
Europe's sane attitude towards hate speech hasn't led to any sort of totalitarian thought police. Your fears are self-important bullshit.

Name: [b]Real[/b] feminist 2012-11-03 18:52

(yes, I know BBCode doesn't work outside of the body field, and the epithet is, you know, tongue in cheek)

One final clarification, I'm not >>85, nor anybody since the message in which I said I was leaving, and this one.

That is all.

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-03 18:52

>>85
``Absolute'' freedom of expression is bad, you infantile mongoloid, and isn't a right anywhere.
Die in a fire you cock sucking cretin.

You already don't have the right to shout fire in a movie theater.
That's seriously the best you can come up with?

Europe's sane attitude towards hate speech hasn't led to any sort of totalitarian thought police. Your fears are self-important bullshit.
I disagree, Europe's attitude towards hate speech is fucking retarded.  Arresting someone for writing a book?  What the fuck.  Fucktarded freedom-hating cretins like you are the reason why I'm writing darknet software, to protect the right of idiots to state their backwards opinions.

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-03 20:56

>>87
That's seriously the best you can come up with?
It's enough to demonstrate that you have a second-grader's/libertarian's understanding of free speech.

I disagree
It's not really a matter of opinion. Your delusions haven't materialised, and people don't get arrested for writing books.

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-03 23:03

>>88
Your delusions haven't materialised, and people don't get arrested for writing books.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roger_Garaudy#Holocaust_denial

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-03 23:11

>>89
he converted to Islam
assalalajihadsalami!

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-04 0:52

>>88
I don't care about what you think about my understanding of free speech, the point is that I shall have the right to say whatever the fuck I want in private.

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-04 0:54

>>91
And the point the rest of us are making is that you're a shitty person for it. Get over yourself.

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-04 0:59

>>92
I think you are a mean person for calling >>91 shitty person.

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-04 1:01

>>92
Who the fuck are you to tell me what to say or think?

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-04 1:04

>>94
Society. Your precious freeze peach cuts both ways; you're under no legal obligation to care about the fact that most people think you're a shitweasel, but that doesn't mean anyone has to put up with you.

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-04 1:11

>>95
freeze peach
Stop mocking essential rights, cretin.

you're under no legal obligation to care about the fact that most people think you're a shitweasel, but that doesn't mean anyone has to put up with you.
Obviously.  However, society still does not have the authority to force me to say or think in a particular way.

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-04 1:13

>>96
Your persecution complex is not my problem.

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-04 1:25

>>96
faggot

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-04 1:52

>>97
Your desire to curtail my essential rights is my problem.

>>98
cretin

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-04 1:09

>>99
Your persecution complex is not my problem.

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-04 1:31

>>100
FUCK OFF AND DIE, FREEDOM-HATING CRETIN. YOU WILL NOT CURTAIL MY FUCKING RIGHTS YOU MOTHERFUCKING PIECE OF SHIT

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-04 2:05

http://i.imgur.com/zpgjp.jpg
Blatant shop. The hand doesn't match and pretty much looks disembodied.

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-04 2:12

>>102
The flag was added as well. Here's the original: http://i.imgur.com/87dMp.jpg

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-04 4:58

>>100
Your superiority complex is your mother's problem.

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-04 12:54

>>85
Yes it has.
>>95
YOU are the real shitweasel.

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-04 13:42

>>104
Hoho, such piercing wit. Thank you for demonstrating why the world thinks libertarians are morons.

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-04 14:23

So I post >>74, leave to get on with stuff, and now everyone's helicoptering their dicks at each other over free speech or something.

/prague/ never fails to pique a certain morbid curiosity, and tht's why I'm never going to leave

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-04 14:31

>>106
No, it's because they don't understand civil rights and they'd rather live in the Dark Ages where they'd enjoy the pleasure of being told what to do all the time while having no say in the glorious leaders' retarded responses to events.

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-04 14:55

>>107
That's what half this thread has been about, even before >>74

helicoptering their dicks
That's just... perfect. Thank you.

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-04 15:03

>>109
Go fuck a goat, cretin-kun.

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-04 15:07

>>110
You're the /prog/ character whose Markov chains always end in ``cretin''.

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-04 15:18

>>111
Nice triples, cretin.

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List