Geometry
1
Name:
Anonymous
2012-10-28 16:21
Triangle, three sides, angles sum to be 90°. Okay, makes sense, 30° per side. Got it.
Square, four sides. That means 120° 180°? 45° per side?
What the flying fuck?
What makes the sum of the internal angles change just because the number of sides change? Explain this bullshit to me please.
2
Name:
Anonymous
2012-10-28 16:25
You are a retard.
3
Name:
Anonymous
2012-10-28 16:32
Have you read your Flatland today?
4
Name:
Anonymous
2012-10-28 16:33
>>1
...angles sum to be 90°[citation needed]
5
Name:
Anonymous
2012-10-28 16:33
>>1
what happens if you take a square and draw a line through the diagonal connecting the opposite points. See anything familiar?
6
Name:
Anonymous
2012-10-28 16:37
Math is bullshit, don't bother trying to make sense out of it.
7
Name:
Anonymous
2012-10-28 16:39
>>1
Die in a fire, and never come back.
Here is the formula:
s = sides of polygon
IA = Sum of internal angles
IA = 180(s-2)°
1
Seriously, die in a fire: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internal_and_external_angle
8
Name:
Anonymous
2012-10-28 16:40
>>5
The angles of the two triangles formed will equal 180°
!
9
Name:
Anonymous
2012-10-28 16:40
>>1
Triangle, three sides, angles sum to be 90°.
It's 180
10
Name:
Anonymous
2012-10-28 16:41
What's the purpose of vectors?
11
Name:
Anonymous
2012-10-28 16:43
>>9
180 is 10313°, this is clearly wrong.
>>10
It's a crippled matrix that mentally midgetated calculus students have to use because their linear algebra is weak.
12
Name:
Anonymous
2012-10-28 16:51
Find a shape whose angles are finite, but the sum of the angles are infinite.
13
Name:
Anonymous
2012-10-28 17:02
>>12
an infinite dimensional cube
14
Name:
Anonymous
2012-10-28 17:19
You gals are getting dangerously close to discussing how many angles can dance on the head of a pin.
15
Name:
Anonymous
2012-10-28 17:20
16
Name:
Anonymous
2012-10-28 17:24
op is the dumbest fuck around
17
Name:
Anonymous
2012-10-28 17:42
>>1
Okay, makes sense, 30° per side
You're fucking retarded
18
Name:
Anonymous
2012-10-28 17:43
19
Name:
Anonymous
2012-10-28 19:15
>>12
Circle.
>>18
Fuck off and die, illogical racist cretin.
20
Name:
Anonymous
2012-10-28 21:04
There is no such thing as a circle.
21
Name:
Anonymous
2012-10-28 21:29
Why do I always get the feeling that the ultrafinitist missed out on that critical period of brain development that supported abstract thinking as a child?
Or maybe I am wrong and they are just Christians, who dislike set theory and infinity because ``there is only one infinity, and that is God''.
22
Name:
Anonymous
2012-10-28 21:36
>>21
Looks like it's the first one.
The modern study of set theory was initiated by Georg Cantor and Richard Dedekind in the 1870s.
Preserving the orthodoxy of the relationship between God and mathematics, although not in the same form as held by his critics, was long a concern of Cantor's.
23
Name:
Anonymous
2012-10-28 21:41
24
Name:
Anonymous
2012-10-28 21:57
>>23
As if Atheist fundamentalists aren't just as bad with their opposition to free speech.
25
Name:
Anonymous
2012-10-28 22:04
Degrees a shit, a grat big one
26
Name:
Anonymous
2012-10-28 22:22
>>24
As if Atheist fundamentalists aren't just as bad with their opposition to free speech.
What the fuck.
27
Name:
Anonymous
2012-10-30 1:57
Explain calculus to me.
28
Name:
Anonymous
2012-10-30 2:44
Dumbest post not made by FrozenVoid!
29
Name:
Anonymous
2012-10-30 15:31
>>1
My sides, they flew away
!
30
Name:
29
2012-10-30 15:33
This is quite probably the most hilarious post on /prog/ in ages
31
Name:
Anonymous
2012-11-15 20:24
>>9
What about spherical triangles?
32
Name:
Anonymous
2012-11-15 21:09
Explain lambda calculus to me.
33
Name:
Anonymous
2012-11-15 21:43
>>32
Bullshit made my faggots and worshipped by LITHP quears.
34
Name:
Anonymous
2012-11-15 22:06
I still don't understand what different types of hexagons you might need to worry about.
35
Name:
Anonymous
2012-11-15 22:26
what's a triangle?
36
Name:
Anonymous
2012-11-15 23:20
>>35
a miserable pile of vertices and line segments.
37
Name:
Anonymous
2012-11-16 1:19
>>1
Listen to this Jew:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Oe2DZc6BXZk
he is one good Jew, because he tells us how to do math without angles and other intangible irrational crap like infinity.
38
Name:
Anonymous
2012-11-16 9:12
>>37
without angles and other intangible irrational crap
Are you trying to say angles are ``intangible irrational'' crap? Might as well forsake everything but the positive integers, fagstorm.
39
Name:
Anonymous
2012-11-16 9:51
>>38
Pythagoras' thm
Typical hymie skipping vowels.
40
Name:
>>39
2012-11-16 9:55
That was for
>>37, not
>>38
Newer Posts