>>28
Yes, my IQ is sooo low compared to all the psychobilly spiky-haired "die cis scum" tatted butch-dykes who disagree with me.
Nice straw-man, dipshit.
You must be sitting there picturing me as some autistic neckbeard surrounded by anime figurines in his mom's basement, but the truth is I'm a social, active, healthy, well-groomed, well-educated and well-employed individual who has no trouble making friends and charming ladies.
I don't care about who you are, nor do I desire to find out more about you.
Now realistically, how many people like that are feminists?
Every single socialist, for instance, simply by definition.
And how many feminists are likable [sic]?
There is no such thing as the obligation to be likeable, much like there is no right not to be offended.
Feminists are angry fucks with mommy/daddy issues.
I find it unlikely that such a badly damaged person would find the path to enlightenment. Perhaps you mistakenly referring to ``sexists'' as ``feminists''?
but I'm not going to sit here and pretend you understand humanity better than me just because your comp lit teacher hated men.
I do seem to understand this particular facet of humanity better than you. While I could simply discard your ad hominem, I'll reply by saying that I am in a pure science program, that I have nothing but contempt for humanities and their students, and that I would punch such a sexist professor right in the cunt.