BREAKING NEWS: m00t sells us out

http://i.imgur.com/909Qx.png

sage

>>2
/le backseat bop/

duckduckgo
Google doesn't give a fuck if you're masturbating to drawings.

I always Google ``site:danbooru.donmai.us utsuho thighhighs small breasts'' while logged with my Google Apps account.

I had to do this for that one Russian imageboard. Someone posted a link here and I wait through some transition page that required JavaScript, then fill out a Google CAPTCHA.

Such a pain. Security should be transparent to the users.

>>4
Why not just search that on Danbooru itself? If you're not joking, I'd be careful. That information might be of no use to Google, but lolicon is illegal in the United States, Canada, many parts of Europe, and probably elsewhere. If a government gets its hand on those data, you could be in a lot of trouble, even if you don't look at explicit lolicon. Here in the UK we had troubles like that with Operation Ore, and in the US they often set up honeypots or ECHELON and then look for an excuse.

Happens when you post HTML. It's because world4ch spammers always attempt to post HTML so it's a good filter.

lolicon is illegal in the United States
No, it isn't. Courts have ruled that lolicon is constitutionally-protected free speech, and cannot be made illegal.

>>4
Personally, I prefer DDG over Google. The added privacy is just a bonus.

>>8
http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0011/001147/114734eo.pdf

>>6
Okuu is not loli, and I use Google because Danbooru is a piece of shit that won't let you search more than two tags at the same time.

I live in Venezuela.

I forgot ``small breasts'' counts as loli in some countries.

>>6
Loli is legal in the US. It's even allowed on /b/.

>>8,13
http://www.monett-times.com/story/1904776.html
Literally today.

http://uscode.house.gov/download/pls/18C71.txt
Too tired to multi-line quote, but
(a) In General.— Any person who, in a circumstance described in subsection (d), knowingly produces, distributes, receives, or possesses with intent to distribute, a visual depiction of any kind, including a drawing, cartoon, sculpture, or painting, that—
(1)
(A) depicts a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct; and
(B) is obscene; or
(2)
(A) depicts an image that is, or appears to be, of a minor engaging in graphic bestiality, sadistic or masochistic abuse, or sexual intercourse, including genital-genital, oral-genital, anal-genital, or oral-anal, whether between persons of the same or opposite sex; and
(B) lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value;
or attempts or conspires to do so, shall be subject to the penalties provided in section 2252A (b)(1), including the penalties provided for cases involving a prior conviction.

(c) Nonrequired Element of Offense.— It is not a required element of any offense under this section that the minor depicted actually exist.

>>14
I would support the law if instead of penalties they put them in mental hospitals where they ought to be.

>>14
England
Well.

>>14
Courts have ruled that lolicon is constitutionally-protected free speech, and cannot be made illegal.

>>17
That's true, but possession of lolicon is a good indicator of the fairly dangerous mental disorder called paedophilia.  While making it illegal is anti-constitutional (and stupid, since it would be a victimless crime), it should constitute a basis for involuntary commitment.

>>13
Shalom, hymie!

>>17
[citation needed]

And not a single fuck was given.
This place is a shithole, its about time it gets shut down.

Moot doesnt give a wet fart about this place and it aint gonna get better. Its probably for the best to put this place out of its misery and someplace else.

And all the fucks were given that day.
This place is a holy grave, its about time it gets revived.

Moot does give a a tad about this place and it is going to get better. Its probably for the best to put this place out of its spotlight and someplace new.

>>14
Project Safe Childhood marshals federal, state, and local resources to locate, apprehend and prosecute individuals who sexually exploit children.
What children were exploited in drawing child-pornographic pictures? I don't get it.

>>23
Murrica!

aoeu

ɐoən

wat is all this?

ʍ̧̜͊̓ͅɐ͚̮̘̳̘̗ͧ̂͋ͬͪʇ̘̣̃́ ̥͎̠̫̼͓̬̃ͭͣ́ͤ̔̚ı̣̯͙̬̞ͮ̿͂ͥ̂̆͢s̤̯̭̎̈́ͥͯ̋̄͑͢ ͇͖̃̈́͝ɐ̭̳̲̿̐̀̀ͦןͯ͌̔͏͖̻͙̫ן̥͙̞̻̟ͪ̆͒̀͌͘ ̘̯̰̱̦̣ͦ͌̀ʇ͔͈̈ͩͬ̽͘ɥ̶͇̥̠̾̈̋̒̊ͅı̴͉̜͊̂͗̚s̩͆̈́̒͑̾̓̽͜¿̀͌̈́ͨͭͬ

You want mirron dorra?  Fuk you!  Here bomb!

>>10
I threw up a little in my mouth.

rollin

I threw up a little in 30-kuns mouth.

no

>>10
Why?  They didn't even militate for purely evil privacy-destroying bullshit like mandatory trusted treacherous computing and governmental spyware for all general purpose computers, or even mass surveillance, or, god forbid, restrictions on cryptography.  IMHO the best they can do is to digitally erase the children in the photos and put them up on the Internet so that people can participate in identifying the location at which the child abuse occurred, or even use image processing to attempt to match the decor against photos on facebook (which would be okay since facebook-using retards have no real expectation of privacy); now that would actually be helpful and effective in reducing child abuse.

>>23
The point is that possession of CP indicates paedophilia, which itself is a dangerous mental condition (much like a very strong rape or murder fetish).  However, it doesn't make sense to prosecute someone for that since it doesn't make sense to prosecute someone for being insane.

the cloud is everywhere. it is always with you. you can not resist. oozing silently into your life. more and more tightly integrated with your mind. From eniac to time sharing to workstations to Desktops to laptops and phones and watches, tvs, cars and eye glasses and skin then blood and brain and then no need for body or world at all. Just you and I walking through our perfect world together.

>>34
even use image processing to attempt to match the decor against photos on facebook (which would be okay since facebook-using retards have no real expectation of privacy)
Remind me why we aren't doing this already?

>>36
Law enforcement agencies might not be doing it, but it is being done.

>>37
Law enforcement agencies might not be doing it, but it is being done.
By whom, then? Also, law enforcement agencies better step up and start doing it; if lives can be saved just by legally examining public data (without mass surveillance, spyware, etc.), then fucking do it already.

>>38
fuck you moralfaggot.

>>39
All your actions leave traces.  Sure, you have the right to privacy and to cryptography, and thanks to them you'll likely get away with downloading mentally diseased content from various secure darknets, because, hey, legally banning information was a pretty dumb idea in the first place.  But know this: the longer you wait before turning yourself in for treatment, the harder it will be.  Oh and if you ever do hurt someone, you will leave traces and you will be found.