Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

Don't know shit

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-17 19:05

If you can't understand this: http://dginasa.blogspot.com/2012/10/brainfuck-jit-compiler-in-around-155.html
you don't know SHIT about programming.

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-17 19:08

My brain has been fried just looking at the URL

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-17 19:11

Fuck off back to Reddit News, ``onegai''.

Name: brainfeckption 2012-10-17 19:18

Wait, Gnu C compiler?!
LOL

Why not a brainfuck JIT compiler main in brainfuck?

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-17 19:19

>>4
s/main/made/

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-17 19:21

If you're bragging about a low LOC count for C, you probably just omitted massive features and error checking. Incomplete is better!

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-17 20:25

>brainfuck

why bother

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-17 20:30

proper quotes[o]
and question marks[/]o
why bother

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-17 20:58

>>6
constant stack size
This is what happens when you're a le Hacker News tier brogrammer concerned more with low LOC count rather thastack overflow

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-18 0:12

This ``code'' is shit.
*Writing code that only works on unoptimized GCC on a POSIX OS on x86
*No optimizations whatsoever, making it slower than an interpreter with RLE
*Assuming no code between labels is reordered or optimized

 inc_sp: /* Increment stack pointer. */

  bf_sp++;

 dec_sp: /* Decrement stack pointer. */

  bf_sp--;

 inc_se: /* Increment stack element. */

inc_sp and inc_se do the same thing, so they can be the same label.

Newer Posts

Don't know shit

1 Name: Anonymous 2012-10-17 19:05

2 Name: Anonymous 2012-10-17 19:08

3 Name: Anonymous 2012-10-17 19:11

4 Name: brainfeckption 2012-10-17 19:18

5 Name: Anonymous 2012-10-17 19:19

6 Name: Anonymous 2012-10-17 19:21

7 Name: Anonymous 2012-10-17 20:25

8 Name: Anonymous 2012-10-17 20:30

9 Name: Anonymous 2012-10-17 20:58

10 Name: Anonymous 2012-10-18 0:12