Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

It is 2012...

Name: George 2012-10-17 6:44

...and you are still using JavaScript? I sure do hope you guys don't do this.

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-17 6:48

I shiggy diggy

GO AWAY

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-17 7:09

lel OP e/b/in win

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-17 10:18

e/b/in
I've seen this term used a number of times but I have no clue what it's supposed to mean.

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-17 10:45

>>4
It's some Finnish meme. They post a picture of a bastardization of pedobear and say it's "ebin" or "e/b/in" because "epic" is wordfiltered on the big Finnish imageboards.
Imageboarders get upset by it, in which case you just remind them that pedobear himself is a bastardization of a Japanese character, and that 4chan has had its fair share of zany catchphrases.

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-17 12:36

>>5
Imageboard freshies also get upset when you reveal to them that ``pedobear'' is a bastardization of pretty kuma, REALLY upset. The younger they are, the more upset they will be, literally. I fucking guarantee it like George Zimmerbergsteinman.

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-17 12:39

And how would you have us make dynamic web pages, if not with Javascript?

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-17 12:46

>>7
Web pages aren't meant to be dynamic.

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-17 13:11

>>4,5
Time to google sprudo spadre you newfags.

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-17 13:32

>>7
Have you ever been reading a book and thought, ``Wow, this book sure is great, but I'd like the text to move and do cool things!''
No? Then don't expect the same of web pages, ``faggot''.

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-17 13:35

>>10-kun has never read a popup book.

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-17 14:01

How will my PHP-enabled Wordpress websites stand out amongst the crowd without jQuery, the crown jewel of Javascript?

Clients love da Lightbox.

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-17 14:05

I don't know why jquery is so popular when the jeesh is better-designed and smaller!

Name: George 2012-10-17 15:10

>>7
It is 2012 and you're still programming webpages? I seriously hope you guys do not do this.

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-17 15:14

>>14
HTML is not a programing language!

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-17 15:18

>>8
>>10

Okay, so how would you host an application on a web page if not by making the page dynamic. Are you suggesting we go back to shoving flash and java applets in everything?

>>14

So you are saying the amount of data on the web should stay constant? That no one should be programming new content?

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-17 15:18

>>15

No, but Javascript is, and it's used in fucking everything.

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-17 15:23

>>17
Which is why I use NoScript.

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-17 15:25

>>15
But it's Turing-complete.

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-17 15:26

>>11
I must confess, I have not. Perhaps that's why I'm so bitter all the time. Sorry, /prog/.

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-17 15:26

>>18

So you enjoy not having the ability to use half the content on the web without manually enabling it?

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-17 15:30

>>21
Yes.

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-17 15:31

>>21
My ``web'' has no jabbascripts.

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-17 15:39

>>21
http://seiup.net/ works fine without it, so why should I care?

Name: HTML, for documentation ONLY 2012-10-17 16:44

come on javascript guys, have you not started the scheme revolution yet. Make it a requirement on your pages, like we did in the 90's with shockwave player. Also tell them that IE is shit, and they should use another browser.

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-17 17:31

>>21
Animated menus are not content.

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-17 17:32

>>18
Same here. Javashit can suck a dick.

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-17 17:40

>>16
The web isn't meant for ``applications''. Only Apple losers think this. ``Web apps'' are...
- not scriptable by the shell
- slow
- proprietary by nature
- subject to change or disappear without the ability to save a copy of the software
- grossly intrusive on user privacy by nature

Pretty much the worst case software possible, for users

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-17 18:15

My clients want animated transitions for their galleries. What alternate do I really have? Flash?

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-17 18:17

it's only 2012 if you're using the shit-tier gregorian calendar

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-17 18:20

>>29
Use CSS if possible.

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-17 18:24

>>29
Find better clients.

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-17 18:27

>>31
Can CSS animate stuff like opacity or position?

I've heard CSS3 or 4 will have that shit, but like no browsers support it. I spend my time trying to get the current CSS to even work on old ass browsers like IE5 that so many people still use for some reason.

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-17 18:31

I'm programming DCSS right now. Dynamic Cascading Style Sheets. Pure C#. Animations, content manipulation, everything.

It'll be the industry standard. I'll be somewhat rich. Within a decade, all you kiddy web designers will be including a .dcss link in your HTML headers.

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-17 19:43

>>33

CSS can. It is CSS3, but most browsers not support CSS animation.

Oh, and >>36

No.

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-17 19:48

w0t

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-17 20:00

>>36
>>36
>>36

─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ▄ ▌ ▐ ▀ ▀ ▀ ▀ ▀ ▀ ▀ ▀ ▀ ▀ ▀ ▀ ▀ ▀ ▀ ▀ ▀ ▀ ▀ ▀ ▀ ▀ ▌
─ ─ ─ ▄ ▄ █ █ ▌ █ ♥ REPOST IF YOU'RE A BIG BEAUTIFUL TRUCK ▐
▄ ▄ ▄ ▌ ▐ █ █ ▌ █ ░♥ ░ WHO DON'T NEED NO HUMAN ░ ♥ ░ ...░░ ▐
█ █ █ █ █ █ █ ▌ █ ▄ ▄ ▄ ▄ ▄ ▄ ▄ ▄ ▄ ▄ ▄ ▄ ▄ ▄ ▄ ▄ ▄ ▄ ▄ ▄ ▄ ▄ ▌
▀ (@)▀ ▀ ▀ ▀ ▀ ▀ ▀ (@)(@)▀ ▀ ▀ ▀ ▀ ▀ ▀ ▀ ▀ ▀ ▀ ▀ (@)▀ ▘

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-17 20:02

>>33
Yes, and with canvas and svg.... Just be sure to use Scheme instead.
Use DCSS with scheme NOW! I need to make a AWK version, and ksh93 too.

>>30
I used International Fixed Calendar, and it is still 2012. However my clients get confused when I date my things today as 2012-11-13 IFC, so I had to stop using it.

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-17 20:03

>>37
>>37
>>37

─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ▄ ▌ ▐ ▀ ▀ ▀ ▀ ▀ ▀ ▀ ▀ ▀ ▀ ▀ ▀ ▀ ▀ ▀ ▀ ▀ ▀ ▀ ▀ ▀ ▀ ▌
─ ─ ─ ▄ ▄ █ █ ▌ █ ♥ REPOST IF YOU'RE A BIG BEAUTIFUL ASCII ART ▐
▄ ▄ ▄ ▌ ▐ █ █ ▌ █ ░♥ ░ WHO DON'T NEED NO ALIGNMENT ░ ♥ ░ ...░░ ▐
█ █ █ █ █ █ █ ▌ █ ▄ ▄ ▄ ▄ ▄ ▄ ▄ ▄ ▄ ▄ ▄ ▄ ▄ ▄ ▄ ▄ ▄ ▄ ▄ ▄ ▄ ▄ ▌
▀ (@)▀ ▀ ▀ ▀ ▀ ▀ ▀ (@)(@)▀ ▀ ▀ ▀ ▀ ▀ ▀ ▀ ▀ ▀ ▀ ▀ (@)▀ ▘

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-17 20:16

>>2012                    `
>not implementing your favourite language in Javascript


casuals

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List