/prog/ - Low-Level JavaScript

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-10 5:05

http://lljs.org/

Soon it will be JavaScript ALL THE WAY DOWN TO HARDWARE! Enjoy the brave new world.

Name: Cudder !MhMRSATORI!fR8duoqGZdD/iE5 2012-10-10 5:26

C-like type system with manual memory management
They removed the parts of JS that people actually want when they use it!

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-10 6:54

Just wait until you see how much memory it hogs!

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-10 8:16

>>2
C-like type system
Okay, now we're getting somewhere

Manual memory management
I can just imagine the node.js kiddies trying to manage their own memory. I want this to happen just to see it all come crashing down in a storm of segfaults.

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-10 10:08

>>4

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-10 10:09

>>4
C-like type system
Okay, now we're getting somewhere
No, we're not. C's type system is a fucking joke, even for a portable assembly. Really poor choice of a type system for a low-level language.

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-10 10:19

*sizeof(anus)*sizeof(anus)*sizeof(anus)*sizeof(anus)

SEGFAULT

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-10 10:46

disgusting

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-10 10:48

>>6
What do you recommend then?

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-10 11:35

>>9
Lisp.

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-10 12:17

>>10
So, no types?

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-10 12:28

A challenger appears

https://developers.google.com/native-client/sdk/release-notes
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ActiveX

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-10 12:28

Terrible!

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-10 12:29

Low-Level JavaScript that "compiles to JavaScript".

What the fuck?

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-10 13:21

>>14
In the grim darkness of the near future, there is only JavaScript.

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-10 13:35

>>15
I'm sure but how do you gain any optimizations if you compile to Javascript?

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-10 13:49



struct Node {

  Node *next;

  int value;

};



let Node *head = new Node, *tail = head;



function Node *add(int value) {

  let Node *next = new Node;

  next->value = value;

  tail->next = next;

  tail = next;

  return next;

}

FORCED TYPEDEF OF STRUCTS

Seppals-quality

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-10 15:15

It's not JavaScript. It has less in common with JavaScript than Java does!

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-10 16:33

>>17

#define function

#define let

VALID SEPPLES CODE

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-10 17:40

>>19
Valid C code.

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-10 18:11

>>20
new
not struct Node *
Have you read your K&R today?

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-10 18:14

(make-Node)

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-31 17:42

Three things are being declared here: an anonymous enumerated type is declared, ShapeType is being declared a typedef for that anonymous enumeration, and the three names kCircle, kRectangle, and kOblateSpheroid are being declared as integral constants.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-31 19:13

ah good to see i'm not alone. also pretty sure this is a bug, but i noticed that your hunger meter drops a lot faster (like as if you had a bunch of "大食【大】" seals equipped.

Low-Level JavaScript

1 Name: Anonymous 2012-10-10 5:05

2 Name: Cudder !MhMRSATORI!fR8duoqGZdD/iE5 2012-10-10 5:26

3 Name: Anonymous 2012-10-10 6:54

4 Name: Anonymous 2012-10-10 8:16

5 Name: Anonymous 2012-10-10 10:08

6 Name: Anonymous 2012-10-10 10:09

7 Name: Anonymous 2012-10-10 10:19

8 Name: Anonymous 2012-10-10 10:46

9 Name: Anonymous 2012-10-10 10:48

10 Name: Anonymous 2012-10-10 11:35

11 Name: Anonymous 2012-10-10 12:17

12 Name: Anonymous 2012-10-10 12:28

13 Name: Anonymous 2012-10-10 12:28

14 Name: Anonymous 2012-10-10 12:29

15 Name: Anonymous 2012-10-10 13:21

16 Name: Anonymous 2012-10-10 13:35

17 Name: Anonymous 2012-10-10 13:49

18 Name: Anonymous 2012-10-10 15:15

19 Name: Anonymous 2012-10-10 16:33

20 Name: Anonymous 2012-10-10 17:40

21 Name: Anonymous 2012-10-10 18:11

22 Name: Anonymous 2012-10-10 18:14

23 Name: Anonymous 2013-08-31 17:42

24 Name: Anonymous 2013-08-31 19:13

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-10 5:05

Name: Cudder !MhMRSATORI!fR8duoqGZdD/iE5 2012-10-10 5:26

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-10 6:54

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-10 8:16

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-10 10:08

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-10 10:09

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-10 10:19

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-10 10:46

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-10 10:48

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-10 11:35

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-10 12:17

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-10 12:28

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-10 12:28

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-10 12:29

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-10 13:21

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-10 13:35

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-10 13:49

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-10 15:15

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-10 16:33

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-10 17:40

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-10 18:11

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-10 18:14

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-31 17:42

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-31 19:13