compiler design question

In my compiler, I have an emitter function that outputs assembly, affecting the stack, and a variable resolution function that manages local variables and their offset from ebp.

I'm trying to track types through intermediate computations, though, and i don't know whether to put this functionality in the emitter, in the scope resolution system, or to merge the two.

A touhou for your thoughts?

dragon book

>>2
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dragon_book
Principles of Compiler Design (1977, the "Green Dragon Book"), by Alfred V. Aho and Jeffrey D. Ullman
Are you sure Alfred V. Aho and Jeffrey D. Ullman have no Jewish genetics? Ullman especially looks like a fucking kike.

>>3
What if he's a kike? Most kikes are smart and I'm not some paranoid retard who thinks a bunch of smart people with stupid beliefs are controlling my media and putting fluoride in my water.

Back to /b/, ``please''.

>>4
Shalom, Hymie!

After some considerating, i have decided that i want a typed stack, so the emitter function would be best suited to manage the type system.

However, this introduces the problem of divorcing variable names from their types, and the possibility of the language changing semantics simply by using an alternative backend code generator.

>>5
If I were a kike, I wouldn't call Jewish people kikes, would I? The JIDF is not that stupid.

>>7
Only Jews and idiots defend the Jews. Are you a Jew or an idiot?

>>8
He seems to be an idiot, because he agrees that kikes "are smart", but refuses to kill them, despite it well known that smart=dangerous and all goyim compete with kikes, having mutually exclusive goals.

>>4
Big media is a huge steaming pile of shit.

In fact, by moving types into the emitter, variable names could follow, and scope resolution could proceed by simply traversing the stack until a stack frame was reached.

Although linear in performance, for a small number of local variables it will not impede compile times compared to the overhead of a hashtable.

This requires the construction of an inner- and outer- emitter to separate the architecture-depending code generation from an imaginary stack-independent virtual bytecode system.

I shall provisionally title this combined emitter/resolution architecture the Joined Inner Declaration Framework

I feel sorry for OP, because I'd like to contribute to this thread but I don't know shit about compilers and the Ahmed Goldberg Alliance is shitting up /anus/ as usual

>>4
Kikes do control the media you dumb shabbos-goy/kike.

>>13
No. They don'.

>>1

If you start a new thread and promise you wont let >>3,4,7,8,9,10,13 post in it, I'll help you.

I forgot to list >>14

After a misguided attempt to implement >>11 i have come full circle in my deliberations. Why re-implement variable resolution within the emitter? What a shocking deseparation of concerns.

Certainly the correct place to manage the stack, is the place where it has always been managed.

I shall close this hg branch and concentrate on the ability to correctly record temporary computations within the existing infrastructure.

>>15
YHBT

Compiler for what language? That has a big influence on what you should do.
I'm trying to track types through intermediate computations, though, and i don't know whether to put this functionality in the emitter, in the scope resolution system, or to merge the two.
Without knowing the language, I would say in the evaluation tree, which should be after variable resolution but before code generation.

offset from ebp.
This isn't 16-bit x86. Use ESP and free up another register for use. It is astounding how many compilers don't default to doing this, out of tradition or something. There is no disadvantage, only advantage.

>>19

has it right.

>>14
Yes they do. They even admit they do. It's time to stop being a hypocrite.

http://blogs.timesofisrael.com/jews-do-control-the-media/
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L-P-q5zDTu8

>>21
Of all accusation, I find the "media control" one the most ridiculous. If you don't like TV, no one forces you to watch it. You ain't in Soviet Union, where the only available newspaper was Pravda. Stop being retarded.

>>22
When people are talking about "the media", they obviously mean the mass, mainstream media. Even the most kookiest of kooks don't think Jews have some superpower to control what xXxNaruto97xXx uploads to his video page.
Also, >>21-san forgot:
http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/commentary/la-oe-stein19-2008dec19,0,4676183.column

It's not like the Jews are denying it. They're proud of it, in very much the same way neo-Nazi skinheads are proud of their race and accomplishments. The difference is, the neo-Nazi skinheads are terrible racists who deserve to be locked up, whereas the Jews are the heroic masterminds behind the movies you're taught to love.

>>22
>Of all accusation, I find the "media control" one the most ridiculous.
Why do you find a fact ridiculous? How are people supposed to make an informed choice on not to watch TV if people like you keep lying about who controls the media?

We may not be in the Soviet Union--no, we're in something far worse.

http://www.ivorydome.us/2011/03/can-political-correctness-be-worse-than-leninism/

>>23
neo-Nazi skinheads
Why do you equate being proud of one's heritage with Neo-Nazi skinheads? Perhaps you've watched one too many Jewish movies about the holocaust. I'm not a skinhead. I'm not a neo-Nazi.

Jews are the heroic masterminds behind the movies you're taught to love.

Can I ask you what is good about egalitarianism, equality, anti-racism, etc? Especially considering Jews themselves run a racist apartheid state in the Middle East, by the name of Israel. Why is it okay for Jews to be racist murderers, but White Europeans are not allowed to even be proud about their heritage?

If you take a step back, you will realize the objective effect of the anti-racist propaganda that Jews push on the media is nothing more than tribal warfare against White Europeans. Never forget that it was Leon Trotsky, the Jewish leader of the Red Army during the Soviet Revolution, who coined the term "racist" specifically to attack and undermine White Europeans.

>>25
>Why do you equate being proud of one's heritage with Neo-Nazi skinheads? Perhaps you've watched one too many Jewish movies about the holocaust. I'm not a skinhead. I'm not a neo-Nazi.
He associates skinhead with being proud with their race, not being proud of your race with being a skinhead. How can you be so ignorant about simple logic. No wonder why the kikes are eating us alive.

>>25                            `
>Europeans
>white

Pretty much only Scandinavia (except Finland), France, Germany, and North Italy. The rest are all non-white.

>>27
You know what I meant. Western Europeans. Non-Jewish Europeans. If you look at a PCA map of the haplogroup genotypes of native Europeans, they're all pretty close compared to non-European haplogroups.

>>26
It was pretty obvious a bijection. Go troll somewhere else.

>>28
Jews are more European genetically than slavs.

>>30
Sorry, but Slavs and Germans are Indo-Europeans, while Jews are Semites: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:IndoEuropeanTree.svg

So no, kike, your place is right beside Arabs and niggers.

>>30
Jews aren't a race. It's more of a religious/political/cultural identity. They're multiracial.

Most Jews alive today are Ashkenazi Jews, who aren't exactly full-blooded Semites, but rather originate from North-West Asia from the old Khazar Empire. As they bordered Eastern Europe and Asia, there of course has been cross-gene transfer from both regions. There are also minute traces of Semetic heritage from when the Khazars converted to Judaism and allowed exiled Semitic Jews into their homeland, who were quickly subsumed.

There are also Ethiopian Jews (they're Black), full-blooded Semitic Jews who managed to survive in the Levant nations, and Shepardi Jews from Spain/Basque.

Slavs aren't wholly Slav, that's Soviet propaganda. Kind of like how in China everyone is "Han Chinese" now when in reality there are multiple racial groups.

Slavs have a strong inheritance from the Rus, a Scandivian tribe who migrated East and ran a trade empire in Eastern Europe all the way down to Byzantium. The Byzantine empire even hired them to be their elite guard for a time.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rus_%28name%29

>>31
That's a fucking language tree, Boris.

>>31
That's a lie perpetuated by Jews. Most Jews today aren't Semites. They are Khazars, and some of them have a tiny amount of Semitic admixture.

``The Implementation of Functional Programming Languages'' (1987) by the Smokin Peyote Joints taught me how to write robust compilers for typed languages.

>>32,34
The Khazar crap is a myth.

https://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/10/science/10jews.html?_r=0
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2834625/posts

>>32
Shalom! That is a lot of pseudoscience even for a Jew.
1. Khazarian hypothesis is a forgery, invented by the Jews themselves, so they can pretend to European citizenship.
2. Russians are composed mostly of Slavs, Finno-Ugric tribes and Tatars/Asians. In Moscow and Ukraine there is a very high influx of Jewish blood.
3. Scandivians had little to do with Slavs, besides giving their name imposing tribute, and only in the Ukrainian part of Russia.

>>36
NY Times, a Jewish publication
Some blog by a Jew
Not an objective source of information.

Here's some real science from peer-reviewed and accredited journals in molecular biology.

http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2010/08/23/1004381107.abstract
http://genomebiology.com/content/pdf/gb-2012-13-1-r2.pdf

>>36
And just to be clear, the papers linked in >>38 show that Ashkenazi Jews are not, for the most part, Semites. They have trace amounts of Semitic admixture, but that's it.

>>37
Why don't you take a look at what the molecular biology community is doing with their GWAS studies, and you shall see that much of what I said about the Rus and Ashkenazim/Khazars are true.