Empty set
Name:
Anonymous
2012-09-25 15:51
An empty set is a set that has no elements.
Name:
Anonymous
2012-09-25 15:55
An invisible unicorn is pink.
Name:
Anonymous
2012-09-25 15:57
An infinitely large set is a conceptual piece of data that can never exist in its entirety.
Name:
Anonymous
2012-09-25 16:00
What is "infinity"?
Name:
Anonymous
2012-09-25 16:02
is there a set which has a cardinality between that of the natural numbers and that of the continuum?
Name:
FFP
2012-09-25 16:07
Infinite is that which has no end.
WYPMP
Name:
Anonymous
2012-09-25 16:20
I see the contradiction
Name:
Anonymous
2012-09-25 16:21
>>7
There is no contradiction.
Name:
Anonymous
2012-09-25 16:21
Name:
FFP
2012-09-25 16:22
Name:
FFP
2012-09-25 16:22
>>9
I'm no kike. But I can see infinity.
WYPMP
Name:
Anonymous
2012-09-25 16:23
>>8
Sets are defined as collections of elements, not as nothings.
Name:
Anonymous
2012-09-25 16:23
An empty element is an element that is 0.
Name:
FFP
2012-09-25 16:24
>>12
Sets are ,,defined" axiomatically.
WYPMP
Name:
Anonymous
2012-09-25 16:29
>>13
Elements cannot be empty
>>14
The common definition is clearly lacking, that's the point of the thread.
Name:
FFP
2012-09-25 16:31
Name:
Anonymous
2012-09-25 16:33
empty set = {}
Name:
Anonymous
2012-09-25 16:34
Name:
Anonymous
2012-09-25 16:35
Name:
Anonymous
2012-09-25 16:36
empty set = U-U
Name:
Anonymous
2012-09-25 16:40
>>20
Not a set anymore. The absence of anything is not a collection of elements.
Somebody step up and properly define ``Set'' and ``Empty set''.
Name:
Anonymous
2012-09-25 16:41
>>21
No. Just because you haven't finished your first year of CS.
Name:
Anonymous
2012-09-25 16:43
A set is a collection of distinct elements. An empty set is a set that contains all those elements that are different from themselves.
Name:
Anonymous
2012-09-25 16:45
"set" is jewish buzzword, just like "collection", "infinity" and "god".
Name:
Anonymous
2012-09-25 17:07
>>21
Go troll someone else, the empty set has always been a set. It's guaranteed by the empty set axiom, which is a part of the canonical set theory.
>>15
I've heard this before, but don't understand. What about the empty string?
Name:
Anonymous
2012-09-25 17:11
>>15,25
The empty element is the only element in the empty set.
Name:
Anonymous
2012-09-25 17:14
>>26
That's not true. The empty string is not in fact a part of the empty set, as it has a value (empty).
Name:
Anonymous
2012-09-25 17:15
>>15,25
Also, an empty element could be another empty set, i.e. {{}}
Name:
Anonymous
2012-09-25 17:16
what use is transfinite set theory?
Name:
Anonymous
2012-09-25 17:17
>>27
You misunderstood. An empty string is not the empty element. The empty element is the element defined by the very lack of an element.
Name:
Anonymous
2012-09-25 17:59
empty set = { x | x is a good female programmer }
Name:
Anonymous
2012-09-25 18:02
>>31
Can't see your "empty set".
Name:
Anonymous
2012-09-25 18:03
An empty set is a like an empty box of goods.
The box is there, and it doesn't have anything inside, but it's there. You can't say "there are no goods so the box disappeared".
On the other hand, you can't have an infinite set, leave that to the Jews.
Name:
Anonymous
2012-09-25 18:05
>>33
i already defined the empty set. see
>>31
Name:
Anonymous
2012-09-25 18:06
>>34
Generalized version:
empty set = { x | x is a good programmer }
Name:
Anonymous
2012-09-25 18:11
r u sayan dat good programars dont exIst?
Name:
Anonymous
2012-09-25 18:14
Name:
Anonymous
2012-09-26 8:48
>>10
>>11
kike so mad he can't even post right
Name:
Anonymous
2012-09-26 8:53
>>38
Anus so pert he can't even quote right
Name:
Anonymous
2012-09-26 9:09
Newer Posts