>>28
Oops, almost forgot this gem:
and most importantly, denying that Mono is NOT .NET.
Up to
>>27 I didn't mention dotnet. I think you can tell by now that I don't care about it and that I'm happy that Mono is not in fact dotnet. You still don't even seem to know what the different parts are called so you might want to give up the hair splitting until you get past talking about the JIT thingy and whatever the hell else you'd like to refer to, god knows what that might be.
If you were able to do that in the first place you might even have identified and appreciated the important parts.