``Anonymous''

Why do people continue to stick up for these douchebags?

An app developer Blue Toad has come forward as the source of the ~1M Apple UDIDs that were supposedly intercepted from the FBI, who obviously had them for evil and nefarious purposes. So of course ``Anonymous'' apologists are claiming the FBI must have paid them to take the fall. Sounds completely legit! ``Anonymous'' would never lie! They're obviously an organization for the people! That's why they breach corporate databases and leak customer emails, passwords and billing addresses. And now UDIDs! They're leaking your information for your own good! Because they love you! They would never sell that information to advertisers like some evil company! They gladly zip it up and torrent it for every scammer in Nigeria to download freely! So altruistic! They have my undying love and support!

Just today they DDoS'd GoDaddy. Gee, I wonder where they got that kind of firepower. Oh, that's right, they have a botnet obtained through a trojan they installed on LOIC and distributed to their own supporters. It's not enough that they screw over random people by leaking their data to make pointless political statements, they have to take it a step further and directly screw in the ass anybody who's stupid enough to trust them. Then they turn into fucking rats the second they get caught up.

They've no honor among the people, their supporters, each other or themselves. They're the worst kinds of rats. Fuck ``Anonymous''.

lol u mad?

>>2
lol
u
u mad?

Oh look, ``Anonymous'' is amongst us.

Back to Twitter, ``1337h4x0r''.

Why the fuck do you care? Why are you calling Anonymous ``they" when it's usually a random neckbeard on his 20yos trying to be cool by putting himself under the label of ``le anonamoos XD"?

Just today they DDoS'd GoDaddy.
How could that possibly be a bad thing?

Anon fights for the lulz above all
take your shit to reddit

what don't you understand about defacing and DoSing websites in the name of free speech OP?

http://blog.cognitivedissidents.com/2011/12/20/building-a-better-anonymous-series-part-0/

discusses what ``anonymous'' is, why it exists today, what its major flaws are and how to improve them. Good read but it's longer than a gawker article so I'm not sure anyone on /dyslexics/ will read it.

Computer criminals behaving like criminals? No way!

It's also amazing how they still think they can't be caught.

There is always a resistance.

Don't expect that the current social system can be without enemies. They are just a natural sistemic reaction to the way the global society is developing.

Understand as it is, not a bunch of rogues, but as an appropiate response to the repression of laws and governments.

If not Anonymous, someone will.

>>9
It's also amazing how they still think they can't be caught.
Most computer criminals are Jewish, so they will be caught only if they harm other Jews.

3) A Jew will defend any crime committed by other Jews. So it is enough to mention any Jewish crime, such as the Holodomor, the atrocities of the Polish Jews, looting of Weimar Germany, or the bombings of the Gaza Strip in Palestine by incendiary phosphorous bombs, which led to the deaths of hundreds of innocent children, and the identity of your companion will become clear as daylight. The Jew will start with foaming at the mouth protecting the Jewish criminals, while a decent person will judge.

/polecat kebabs/, please!

>>1
Obviously you have not fully grasped the nature of Anonymous. It has not set of rules, objectives or moral values. Whenever someone feels like it, he can say he acts in the name of ``Anonymous'' and do something. This amounts to a whole lot of different people wanting different things, manipulating the public for their purpose, and mostly failing.

I have to admin, it's kind of nice how stupid people think of it as a representation of The Internet.