Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

Better implementation

Name: Anonymous 2012-08-30 15:07

Ok, first time I post here.
I want to write down my own imageboard program, just for the heck of it, and I am in a dilemma.
The way I had thought of it, I would have a single "content" file, that would be dynamic, and all the content would be generated within it.
However when I looked into futallaby for reference, the way they do it, is that there is no main "content" page, all pages are genereted within the script but are then dumped and delivered as static  html pages.
So, I want to axe you this question:
>Which way do you think its a better implementation?

>OP is a faggot

Name: Anonymous 2012-08-30 15:13

Databases are crap.

Why would you want to quote "Which way do you think its a better implementation?"? That doesn't make sense and you didn't even do it right.

Generating the content on the fly might be a bit harsh on your server, but it should make things more flexible, but things will go to shit more quickly. Personally, I'd go for a static approach.

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List