Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

Any decent modern general-purpose languages?

Name: Anonymous 2012-07-25 10:55

Assembly: Unportable. No standardised syntax.
Classical Visual Basic: Some good parts. Shit overall.
C: Shitty standard library. Deficient type system. Can't into Unicode. ``Unportable assembly.''
D and C++: Obfuscated boilerplate languages.
Java and C#: Forced OOP.
Common Lisp: Archaic cons-based library. Writing complex macros is a PitA due to the unlispy quotation syntaxes.
Scheme: CL without namespaces.
Clojure and Erlang: Concurrency is unneeded outside of a few very specific applications. Parallelism is where it's at.
OCaml: Great language, only one, deficient, implementation.
Haskell: Academic sex toy.
Forth: Reinventing the wheel over and over.
Ruby: Implicit declarations. Slow as fuck.
Python: Implicit declarations. FioC.
Perl: Brain damage.
PHP: Pretty much shit.
JavaScript: "" == false

It's impossible to list them all but, please, what decent modern general-purpose languages exist?

Name: Anonymous 2012-07-27 14:40

>>84
However, it's extremely rare that such an optimization would be worth more than general portability. It certainly shouldn't be a requirement for a general-purpose language (note that ``general'' does not mean ``specific set of hardware''). So, when you REALLY have to use that, you can use whatever convoluted way you can think of, since it's quite unlikely that you'll be doing it regularly.

>>85
And that's exactly what I said. That block isn't a part of the C language, but is a very common compiler extension.

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List