Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

Any decent modern general-purpose languages?

Name: Anonymous 2012-07-25 10:55

Assembly: Unportable. No standardised syntax.
Classical Visual Basic: Some good parts. Shit overall.
C: Shitty standard library. Deficient type system. Can't into Unicode. ``Unportable assembly.''
D and C++: Obfuscated boilerplate languages.
Java and C#: Forced OOP.
Common Lisp: Archaic cons-based library. Writing complex macros is a PitA due to the unlispy quotation syntaxes.
Scheme: CL without namespaces.
Clojure and Erlang: Concurrency is unneeded outside of a few very specific applications. Parallelism is where it's at.
OCaml: Great language, only one, deficient, implementation.
Haskell: Academic sex toy.
Forth: Reinventing the wheel over and over.
Ruby: Implicit declarations. Slow as fuck.
Python: Implicit declarations. FioC.
Perl: Brain damage.
PHP: Pretty much shit.
JavaScript: "" == false

It's impossible to list them all but, please, what decent modern general-purpose languages exist?

Name: Cudder !MhMRSATORI!FBeUS42x4uM+kgp 2012-07-26 4:51

I want a language in which you can go as high or as low-level as you like. If you just want to write programs quickly you can use lambdas, dynamic types, etc. but you should also be able to drop down to the level of inline asm for those parts where the compiler isn't good enough. The closest to that at the moment is probably C++.

>>45
And it's withstood the test of time. Besides the classic 8-bits (6502, Z80, 8051, etc.) what other CPU architectures have lasted as long?

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List