Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

Any decent modern general-purpose languages?

Name: Anonymous 2012-07-25 10:55

Assembly: Unportable. No standardised syntax.
Classical Visual Basic: Some good parts. Shit overall.
C: Shitty standard library. Deficient type system. Can't into Unicode. ``Unportable assembly.''
D and C++: Obfuscated boilerplate languages.
Java and C#: Forced OOP.
Common Lisp: Archaic cons-based library. Writing complex macros is a PitA due to the unlispy quotation syntaxes.
Scheme: CL without namespaces.
Clojure and Erlang: Concurrency is unneeded outside of a few very specific applications. Parallelism is where it's at.
OCaml: Great language, only one, deficient, implementation.
Haskell: Academic sex toy.
Forth: Reinventing the wheel over and over.
Ruby: Implicit declarations. Slow as fuck.
Python: Implicit declarations. FioC.
Perl: Brain damage.
PHP: Pretty much shit.
JavaScript: "" == false

It's impossible to list them all but, please, what decent modern general-purpose languages exist?

Name: Anonymous 2012-08-08 13:23

>>246
Cutting off half the opcode space to do that is hardly desirable,
I don't hear you bitch about the ?ax-specialized opcodes in x86, though. Or multiple encoding for the same instruction. Or the 66h/67h prefixes.
not to mention 256 registers is still way too much for the majority of use cases.
Make them 32, 4 bit for each register, add r1 r2 r3 is now 20 bit, add r1 r2 is now 16 bit. They're, saved you're space again.

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List