Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

Any decent modern general-purpose languages?

Name: Anonymous 2012-07-25 10:55

Assembly: Unportable. No standardised syntax.
Classical Visual Basic: Some good parts. Shit overall.
C: Shitty standard library. Deficient type system. Can't into Unicode. ``Unportable assembly.''
D and C++: Obfuscated boilerplate languages.
Java and C#: Forced OOP.
Common Lisp: Archaic cons-based library. Writing complex macros is a PitA due to the unlispy quotation syntaxes.
Scheme: CL without namespaces.
Clojure and Erlang: Concurrency is unneeded outside of a few very specific applications. Parallelism is where it's at.
OCaml: Great language, only one, deficient, implementation.
Haskell: Academic sex toy.
Forth: Reinventing the wheel over and over.
Ruby: Implicit declarations. Slow as fuck.
Python: Implicit declarations. FioC.
Perl: Brain damage.
PHP: Pretty much shit.
JavaScript: "" == false

It's impossible to list them all but, please, what decent modern general-purpose languages exist?

Name: Anonymous 2012-07-30 20:18

>>177
3/10.

>>183
You're now blurring "optimizing ahead" and "writing shitty code" into one thing. You can not optimize your design ahead-of-time and still have bug riddled code.

Of course, this partially does depend on your language. If you're gonna be writing a decently sizeable system in something like C, you will indeed need to do a fair degree of ``premature optimization'', simply because changing large chunks later takes so much time and will end up introducing more bugs in the process.

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List