Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

OOP is ?

Name: Anonymous 2012-07-15 9:19

http://harmful.cat-v.org/software/OO_programming/why_oo_sucks

Why do people hate on OO so much.  Do a degree it was forced down my throat in college and many of its principles I disagree with.  It almost seemed design to cause code bloat and run slower than a non OO language, but still has some reasonable application in modern programming.

Name: Anonymous 2012-07-15 16:03

There are no efficiency problems with OOP. Usually these circlejerk pseudo-arguments are used to promote C or some similarly ancient language. OOP can only be inefficient if you use vtables and dynamic binding, but then again typical C code is littered with function pointers which are the same shit. But obviously you wouldn't use polymorphic objects in a high performance setting. Nor would you use RTTI in C++ (the name should give it away as being a performance-degrading feature). Simple classes with encapsulation have no detrimental runtime effect. Do some fucking research ( http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/TR18015.pdf ) before you type stupid shit in a sorry attempt to parrot memes.

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List