/prog/ - Retarded Coding Standards

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-22 1:20

"Always compare equality with a constant on the left, for example if (5 == maxUsers) instead of if (maxUsers == 5). If neither of the expressions being compared are constants, rewrite the condition so it is, for example if (0 == userCount - userLimit) instead of if (userCount == userLimit)."

"For consistency with the previous rule, non-equality comparisons should also be formatted using the same style. For example, use if (0 < userCount) instead of if (userCount > 0), and if (0 < userCount - userLimit) instead of if (userCount > userLimit)."

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-22 15:37

>>27
Best solution for everyone:



//;--# Disclaimer: the syntax here is completely arbitrary, I'll use all comment syntaxes I know to achieve full neutrality, except VB's because it's retarded above salvation.



--//#; `let', `var', whatever to declare variables, refs instead of everything-is-mutable (optional).

let x = getX(), y = make_ref(2);

//--#; (:=) assigns to refs/mutable variables. Its return type is void or unit.

y := 3;



#//;-- Then equality is one of:



;#//-- If the language doesn't permit definition of new operators. If it's in a let, it's a binding =, else it's just an operator.

if x = y ...

#;--// the usual, x = y is a syntax error: expected expression, got a binding form.

if x == y ...

Retarded Coding Standards

1 Name: Anonymous 2012-06-22 1:20

28 Name: Anonymous 2012-06-22 15:37

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-22 1:20

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-22 15:37