The state of /prog/ [PART MMXII]

I direct this appeal to all who believe in our state and our Board. If you were alone, what would you be in this world if the quality posts were the only thing you consider to be the community? You owe this to everyone! Don't tell me, "All right, but it's a bother to outspam the spammers and fight off the shitposters." You have never known what it's like to be shit-flooded into dissolution, otherwise you would know what a bother it is to be dissolute! Sometimes you read in the newspaper that a wizard committed suicide along with his toy languages because of the decay in our community. My dear /prog/sgenosse, these are not bad people! Secondly, that is not an easy decision to make! It must be easy for you to clean up this board of shitposters when you know other people would have given their lives for you!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iZG9NXmuCaE

They'll get bored of spamming eventually. It's happened before and it'll happen again, just ignore it.

Wait, Hitler actually wanted to save us?

Oh, didn't watch the video.

That said, if it wasn't for Hitler we'd not have put a man on the moon.

>>3,4
If it wasn't for the kikes, we would have had a permanent base on both the moon and mars by now. Instead, they turned space exploration and colonization into a game of mediocrity by making it international and multicultural. Now the Chinese are about to overtake the West, and rightfully so. I wonder what the kikes have cooking up to throw a wrench in the Chinese plans, and if the Chinese are ready for total war? Someone needs to save us from the tyranny of the kikes.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NgSoEbC3UWU

>>5
No, Hitler would have continued to use his technology to decimate the rest of the world rather than space exploration. It's only when his former empire was carved up and German scientists dispersed to the US and Russia that the space race began.

Don't believe >>6, he's a kike. Hitler didn't want war, Hitler tried to negotiate peace. It was Jew-controlled Britain, France, and the USSR who wanted war. Britain and France declared war against Germany first. And it was the Jews themselves who declared war against Germany in 1933.

Proof:

http://www.wintersonnenwende.com/scriptorium/english/archives/articles/jdecwar.html
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ikgf9Ea2sQw
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0VJXlqfiypU

It's exactly the same situation that is happening to various middle-eastern countries like Syria and Iran right now. The kikes are the real war mongers. The kikes are the ones decimating the world with their weapons of mass propaganda and economic subversion.

I've yet to hear any reasonable (full stop) explanation regarding what the end game of all this nonsense is.  Regardless of whatever the goals, there are countless easier ways to achieve whatever the aforementioned Semitic conspiracy could hopes to achieve.  Even more fantastic, if the conspiracy is as strong or at least as prolific as suggested, there's no excuse to not have already been able to achieve it; and, not just today, but at numerous yesterday junctures.  Even worse is that if it really is as obvious as the "people who are aware of the conspiracy" point out, then why even need a conspiracy or a shadow government?  it'd be too obvious to need that level of obfuscation as a mask, especially with how dumb they think the rest of us must have to be.

Things like this are especially true when interpretations of the same past event are contradictory.  I've run into a number of people, lately, in exploring this conspiracy talk, who believe the actions of Nazi Germany was a major stride against the "shadow Jewish conspiracy" equal to the number of people who believe the war was manufactured to evoke pity for the Jewish people.  It can't be both; and, if it is either, or even if it were both, it just falls back in line with my "easier ways to accomplish things" argument.

Add up all the things attributed to its battle and, in the end, there is no sense to be made of any of it; it's just a group of stories that don't have sufficient relation to each other.

In fact, I'll conclude with a question, even if nothing else in my post is addressed: what stops the "great Jewish conspiracy" from achieving the full effects of whatever it hopes to accomplish right now, either by hook or crook?

Ask beemp3.com for their CAPTCHA software, it's extremely effective (see http://beemp3.com/img.php?ppa=9068 for an example).

>>8
Right. Everyone eventually asks this question. Why go to all of the trouble? Why bother taking over the world and subjugating all non-Jews and enslaving them as the worker/slave caste in a communist world government. Where is the motive?

And then you learn about the Babylonian Talmud, the Jewish encyclopedic interpretation of the Torah, the Old Testament, made by the Pharisees... the same Pharisees that Jesus spoke out against and was condemned and executed for doing so.

The Talmud commands Jews to sacrifice the non-Jews in a blood offering during their holiday of Passover to reawaken Yahweh, their God, so their exile can be nullified, and then they can be led to their promised land where they will each personally be given ~1500 non-Jewish slaves. This is the side of the religion of Judaism that they don't want non-Jews to know, but you can read it yourself.

Now, honestly, this is all just a bunch of more nonsense, kind of like how the Quran tells Muslims they will have 100 wives in heaven for waging holy war or whatever, or that the Bible tells of Jesus returning in the Rapture to take all Christians to heaven while the rest burn. But when you realize that that this is actually what the Jewish elite believe themselves, that this is what motivates them, their actions begin to make sense.

As for the stigma of so called "conspiracy theory." What was the Iran Contra Affair? It was a real conspiracy within the US/Israeli governments that happened in recent times and was white washed by an investigation committee. Or what about the Gulf of Tonkin incident, which the NSA officially admitted recently in a FOIA request never actually happened--it was a false flag event that led to the Vietnam War. Conspiracies do happen. Just stay away from the crackpots that mix in aliens, reptiles, Illuminati, ancient astronauts, and all of that insanity.

Now the plans of various unconnected groups of conspirators in different nations never goes 100% accordingly to how they expected things would. History is a string of blundered conspiracies following one another made by different groups who aren't necessarily cooperating with one another. Why do you expect that for conspiracies to be true that they must be executed infallibly, and that if they screw up, that makes it a non-conspiracy?

>>8
You're a prescribing too much importance to mere words. You're projecting too much of the textbook definition of "conspiracy theory" on what is actually happening and thus falling into the trap of discounting anything you label as a "conspiracy theory" to be highly suspect in your view. Who do you think coined the phrase "conspiracy theory" in the first place? Karl Popper, the Marxist-Jewish philosopher. You see, the Neo-Marxists and the academics at the Frankfurt School realized that if you control the language, you control the minds of the masses. And yet the map is not the territory. Just because you've labeled something that is in reality true as a "conspiracy theory" doesn't make it false because you want it to be false.

What's stop Jews from achieving their goals tomorrow is that if they move too quickly, too many people will wake up to their plight at once and revolt, as has happened many times in the past. Think Nazi Germany, think Russia during the 18th century during and after the Napoleonic Wars, or look at how the Jewish media is trying to deal with the advent of the Golden Dawn party in Greece this weekend. The Jews have overplayed their hands in the past, and they're trying not to let their grasp slip by moving too abruptly. It takes a few generations of brainwashing in the media, as ex-KGB propagandist Yuri Bezmenov has told us.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y3qkf3bajd4

>>8
If there isn't a Jewish conspiracy, what's this?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ha1rEhovONU

>>8
Watch this and wake up: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q6c_dinY3fM

>>10
Personally, you're my favorite reply, even if you didn't answer my last question.  Solid points on human behavior and acknowledgment on the limitations of both my analysis and even some allowances to the limitations of your argument.  So, then, my next question: why not then just focus on the real problem - the elites - than widespread loath of a whole demographic that may not even be aware of the deception themselves and perhaps not desire or believe the end goal, at least not in its gorey manifestation? in short, why does a specific problem turn into hate and violence against everyone of the same ethnicity as the perpetrators?

>>11
Who do you think coined the phrase "conspiracy theory" in the first place?
Stop changing the subject in an attempt to diffuse the argument please.
Just because you've labeled something that is in reality true as a "conspiracy theory" doesn't make it false because you want it to be false.
And the opposite is true as well.  Calling something false true does not make it true.  Even if everyone then starts believing it as true, and all the books write about it, it will still have always been a lie that had been conflagrated.

>>11-13
And stop speaking in damn Youtube videos (no, don't switch to Viddler or some other service either) when that never works and people just tune you out.  That just makes you seem like sheep to the people you call sheep, and who you want to convince.  You have a mouth (well, fingers, anyway): talk.

>>14
You really need to watch >>13 he provides video evidence to back up his claims. You don't need an account to view it. I find it ironic how you refuse to watch something if it's a youtube video, and yet you refuse to believe in "conspiracies." Yes, Youtube/Google might be engaging in a conspiracy to undermine your privacy, but that doesn't discredit the veracity of the video content. You're shooting the messenger.

I'm not about to transcribe or paraphrase the video, because that would only insult Bill Whittle. He explained it far better than I could.

Watch it, or I'll take it as a concession of defeat in the argument.

Why do you expect that for conspiracies to be true that they must be executed infallibly, and that if they screw up, that makes it a non-conspiracy?
Everything is blamed on conspiracies: Jews control the banks, Jews own the media, Jews are forcing cars on the street forcing me to pay parking fines. Without good evidence, it's all just a matter of interpretation. While it's true that the Talmud may call for terrible things, what evidence is there to show that these influential Jews follow it?

>>14
The video of >>12 was US General Wesley Clark talking in 2007 about how when he was at the Pentagon a few days after the attacks of 9/11, he was talking with one of the staff members who said that because of the attack, they're going to attack Afghanistan and Iraq, and when he asked "Why Iraq? Did they link Saddam to 9/11?" the response was "No... the US military is good at destroying and occupying countries, so upper brass thinks that if they take out some countries in the region it will intimidate the enemy." Of course, that's not really why the "upper brass" wanted to attack Iraq, but that was the reason given to the lower ranks.

Then he describes how he was visiting the Pentagon a few weeks later, and ran into the same staff member, and he asked again "Are we still going to attack Iraq?" and the staff member says "it's worse than that, I got a memo from the Secretary of Defense... they want to attack 7 countries in 5 years... Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and Iran."

And guess what has happened in recent years? The Iraq war dragged on longer than they had planned and probably went way over budget, so they have had to switch strategies. It hasn't been an overt war, but a covert war. The Arab Spring was a CIA/Mossad operation. Stuxnet was a US/Israeli job, that's proven fact now. Kony 2012 is being used to justify sending NATO into the Sudanese basin region right now. The war mongering with Syria and Iran on the mainstream media has been nonstop.

Wesley Clark then talks about a meeting he had with Paul Wolfowitz back in 1991 after the Gulf War, about how Wolfowitz wanted to go in and take over a bunch of old soviet proxy regimes before the next great superpower came along, and that what's happening right now is a continuation of that policy. Wesley Clark openly states that there was a policy coup within the American government by the puppet masters behind the Neoconservatives--the Project for a New American Century (PNAC) group, a neocon thinktank, of which Wolfowitz was a contributor.

The Project for a New American Century group has a website.

They're almost all Jewish Neoconservatives.

http://www.newamericancentury.org/aboutpnac.htm

They also wrote a report a year before 9/11 occurred, entitled "Rebuilding Americas Defenses."

http://www.newamericancentury.org/RebuildingAmericasDefenses.pdf

In it, they describe the future wars in the Middle East, the fight for control over the Sudanese Oil Basin region, and ultimately the need for military control over the entire Balkans area as key to projecting military dominance over Russia or China in future conflict.

I'm sure you've heard of plenty of 9/11 inside-job conspiracies, but didn't understand what the motive would be. You now have it. A false flag to justify preemptive war for the sake of military dominance over the globe.

Don't forget that the Patriot Act was written a decade in advance of 9/11, and was just sitting around ready to be taken out of the drawer when the time was right.

>>16
The videos provide evidence. You're ignoring evidence because you're being overly pedantic.

>>18
Without correctness, you can literally blame anything on anything by being deceptively ambiguous. Judgment ought to be clear with the facts, not loose with co-incidences. The Talmud promotes terrible things - fact. The Jews of power follow the Talmud and are working to make it happen - speculation. It's all speculation until you have clear and solid evidence. Quotes from the people involved are a smoking gun. Interpretations from outsiders do not shed the whole truth and are probably half-truths.

>>14
>Stop changing the subject in an attempt to diffuse the argument please.
I'm not really changing the subject, just demonstrating another example of how influential Jews seek to subjugate and conquer non-Jewish societies. It's not a centralized conspiracy, but an ad hoc conspiracy of one group against another. It's simple group evolutionary dynamics.

Professor Kevin MacDonald talks a lot about this in his research, and doesn't shy away from describing Judaism as a particularly aggressive group identity.

>>19
>>17 provides clear and solid evidence. The elite Jews who are behind this don't deny it, they brag about it in their intellectual circles. They just don't flaunt it openly on mainstream news. They think they've won in the West, and so don't need to hide completely behind closed doors. They control the media, they have mass psychology mostly figured out enough, and feel they can keep the masses suppressed.

After all, wasn't it the Zionist Jew, Edward Bernays, the nephew of Sigmund Freud himself, who developed the systematic use of propaganda used today in the media and by governments to influence and control the population during peace time? It's known as "Public Relations."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edward_Bernays

More proof something is afoot.

the state of my dubs

check 'em

>>21
They just don't flaunt it openly on mainstream news. They think they've won in the West, and so don't need to hide completely behind closed doors. They control the media, they have mass psychology mostly figured out enough, and feel they can keep the masses suppressed.
This is exactly what I mean. Without a clear and simple way of presenting the facts as facts with minimal interpretation involved, this is an interpretation of various events of history. Perhaps the Jews believe they won. Perhaps they are masters at mass psychology. Perhaps they use their knowledge to indoctrinate society to achieve a certain outlook on history. The evidence that I'm asking here is no different to the evidence I ask when debating religion, history, science or policy: where did the evidence originate and how well can I trust it?

Israeli President Shimon Peres boasts about how Israel is buying up the world, about how proud they should be they they're talented at buying up countries: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JL4Cu-K17vE

Israeli President Ehud Barak, interviewed three hours after the 9/11 attacks, discusses how the world is going to be completely changed, that it's time to deploy a globally consorted effort against all forms of terror, that we must give up freedoms to achieve this goal, that there are 6 or so countries that host terrorists that must be dealt with in the coming years, and that it was probably Osama Bin Laden who did it--the first mention of his name that day... Ehud Barak knew before everyone else what the narrative of the story was going to be: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GAueLjdKh1s

>>21
Oh, a nicely presented timeline of history together with citations to quality evidence goes a long way to maintaining credibility.

>>23
If a media organization they control accidentally does something they don't like, and then what they did suddenly disappears from public discussion in the media days after, that's usually a good indication that they want to hide something that could be damaging.

For example, do you remember media reports about multiple vans packed with explosives or traces of explosives stopped by police in around the WTC on 9/11? Do you remember how the media reported that they were Israeli. Do you fail to remember how any of this discussed in the official 9/11 Commission Report--that's because they didn't discuss it at all, they swept it under the rug.

Here's one such media report from CNN on that day:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ya7n6ItkUF8

The official police reports of the arrests of the Israelis do exist. As well as official police reports of how top FBI officials swept in and deported the Israelis on "visa violations" before they could be charged and prosecuted. Plus the news stories of them being arrested still exist as well. Plus video footage they took themselves of the first building being hit by a plane, and them celebrating the impact.

In this thread, we enjoy observing race-based paranoia.

Actually, if there was a way to filter out all of the posts and threads authored by "FFP", there wouldn't really be much spam left. Although, the downside is that they'd probably retaliate by using "Anonymous" since they're so desperate for /prog/'s attention.

I suppose, if the first idea is possible, then filtering out rubbish like

䤴鑑噈荨莘ᎇ▓睦鍉聰ř厓硴劘Ȑ卩␵险

shouldn't be difficult at all.

>>27
When you see the truth, you can't help but be paranoid... it's the natural reaction in the face of an enemy. Jews themselves are also highly paranoid of non-Jews... they even go as far as to fake hate crimes on themselves so they can feel victimized.

Example: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xDVKAb_9KeM

I don't go around spreading misinformation and faking hate crimes. Jews do. Who's more paranoid?

>>30
Your "truth" is an awfully warped version of reality.

If you can't see the evidence for how Jews are winning the evolutionary war against the rest of humanity, you and your offspring deserve to go extinct.

>>32
You have no understanding of evolution.

>>31
The objective truth still exists. Reality is still objective, even when our own minds paint a subjective window on this reality. And we aren't incapable of grasping at certain facets of the objective truth. You just have to look beyond the pigeon holes of human language using category theory.

Relativism and pure subjectivism is nonsense that Marxists and Jews like to talk about to push their ideologies.

>>30
*cuckoo clock sound effect*

>>33
You have no understanding of Evolutionary Psychology.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolutionary_psychology

Does Professor Kevin MacDonald have no clue about evolution or how Jews are "winning?"

Kevin MacDonald Discusses Jewish Influence On Western Culture - 1 of 6: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k9ScVv5PukA

>>35
*The Simpsons opening theme song*

"Oh, The Simpsons is on, better rot my mind in front of the TalmudVision instead of get organized and developing a proper resistance against the Jewish threat." - You

>>36
Evolutionary psychology is quite irrelevant to a discussion of your Jew-based paranoia.

Also, appealing to a non-authority? No thanks.

>>37

                       _.----_
'-._                  ___.....___
    `.__           ,-'        ,-\`-,
        `''-------'          ( p \  `._    HAVE YOU READ
                              `-'      (  YOUR TORAH TODAY?
                                        \
                                        \
                               ,---..,--'
   ................._          '--...--,
                     `-.._         _.-'
                          `'-----''

>>38
You're the one changing the subject now. I think you're a crypto-kike. Only a kike would go to such great extremes to defend fellow kikes.