>>49
They will say that those are completely different, because children should not be sexualized. You can't argue with
logos with them because they don't care about logic. you can't argue
ethos because they think that molestation is worse than murder and for some reason think ridiculous things, such as that every pedophile is a child rapist who would use lolicon to groom children, or do some slippery slope nonsense that a single picture of drawn loli is going to turn any man into a serial rapist.
The only thing that might work is
pathos. You should appeal directly to the moralfag's emotions. It is how they form opinions, almost invariably.
Don't try to alert them to their cognitive dissonance, because that will only serve to convince them further that you are delusional. Don't try to argue freedom, because you are different, thus they don't think that rights should apply to you.
So, once again: Why should a moralfag make the distinction between lolicon and actual child pornography.