Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

Stopping the spread of CP through any means

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-14 18:29

How would I go about writing a virus that takes down CP websites? I know C and perl, but I've never written a virus or done any Greyhat things before. I'm not asking for a tutorial, but just a few pointers in the right direction to start learning.

Thanks in advanced for the advice.

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-15 20:14

>>39
No. lolicon is 2d

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-15 20:15

>>41
Why would a typical moralfag make the distinction?

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-15 21:03

>>42
It's no different to making an animation where a villian kills other people. Nobody has to get hurt in the making of that animation. Is Arnold Schwarzenegger a killer for his role in the Terminator? Is Matt Damon a killer for his role in Mr Ripley?

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-15 23:50

>>43
Yes, but why would a moralfag make the distinction? Sexualized images of children means a death sentence to most of them. Why would the fact that lolicon is 2D make any difference to 99% of voters when they get into ``think of the children'' mode? For instance, take >>1. Someone asked if lolicon was included in the definition of CP to the OP, who seems to be so much of a moralfag that he wants to be a vigilante too. Why would the fact that lolicon is a cartoon make a difference to a faggot like that? It wouldn't, because people who sexualize children are pedophiles and pedophiles must be destroyed.

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-15 23:56

Lolicon is pig disgusting. You should be ashamed, whoever it was that mentioned how good it is. Ashamed!!

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-15 23:58

>>42
>>44
Go to /b/ to use you're '-fag' suffix, ``please''.

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-16 0:02

>>46
No.

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-16 0:06

>>47
Your such a ``No.-fag''.

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-16 0:19

>>44
Tell them that we have to ban all movies and video games involving violence or otherwise everybody is a violent thug and a killer.

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-16 0:39

>>49
They will say that those are completely different, because children should not be sexualized. You can't argue with logos with them because they don't care about logic. you can't argue ethos because they think that molestation is worse than murder and for some reason think ridiculous things, such as that every pedophile is a child rapist who would use lolicon to groom children, or do some slippery slope nonsense that a single picture of drawn loli is going to turn any man into a serial rapist.

The only thing that might work is pathos. You should appeal directly to the moralfag's emotions. It is how they form opinions, almost invariably. Don't try to alert them to their cognitive dissonance, because that will only serve to convince them further that you are delusional. Don't try to argue freedom, because you are different, thus they don't think that rights should apply to you.

So, once again: Why should a moralfag make the distinction between lolicon and actual child pornography.

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-16 0:50

>>50
they think that molestation is worse than murder
Actually, murdering someone ends their suffering immediately; molestation might result in life-long trauma and suffering, and possibly incessant feminist-like whining.  Do you really want more feminists on this planet?

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-16 1:09

>>50
Anything that can be applied to violence can also be applied to lolicon. Slippery slope, violence grooming and murder. It's all equal.

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-16 10:27

>>21
w

>>10
And you'd know would you? You've visited all CP sites? How about motherless?

>>43
I guess they could argue that it enticing the viewer to carry out these fantasies in real life. Whether, there's any evidence behind this I do not know.

On a general note why was peadestry[sic] acceptable in ancient Greek times but isn't now? Not that I'm defending that sort of thing, but it's all a matter of perspective.

Paedophilia can be an illness. As characterized by that man who had a tumour on the part of his brain that controls decision making.

The more you ostracise them, the further you'll drive them underground and make the problem worse.

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-16 14:10

http://wikiislam.net/wiki/Islam_and_Pedophilia

By opposing pedophilia, you are opposing the will of Allah.

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-16 21:04

⤱耵晧Ԇ挡垇䞖灧ဥ㘵恧锧偉呅砶䕉劕蜃腂靦䎖萕鐵瑰睔̷ᝅ礉㡣շᤐ産㌴畁㢆镐除朗椄Жጐ䠃㜨嚖暘≘频鐲㝠〨唤遦ᅑ愷ㄈ桵䈗匱袔ј户䉂⒇牃熗膉Ҙ䀧嘢uぃⅠ⠀と㔥⎂扒眱靷ぶ㌢♆ᑶ茥⠸䔒愅隉⍤蠰衦癖瀃Բ茒ሷ䥴ࢇ塹ᄔ䤃ሄᤤ鉨ቡłɰ蜴㘶〧㘳䑳妑ܷᝓ嚈〇䈶䑂ᜇ襴᝖Ԇ率㥅瀩畉ረ蕱斄㝥㍰ធ儇犔恃剘ᤀ饧梂颖桧蕸ᅳͲ递☶ʉ悓瘰ጐ堅饶တ疐杁ų✸⑵♵怸㠓暔ᑓ獵頓ㄆ霕㑆⤴䢅儉䖀荳⍂礆ㅠ慗㎒ᥓ即᜖犑禈ᑀ㈅儱䤗еሐᘤࡐ鐖枘㤵楠圥╡䑳ᖀ㄁塇阄ᝃ梗ㅸ⡒㤹㐩枆瀳㘄䙒錐㜧項䈵Ź莃销䎅ᑢጡ䀡⌒㡴ጧ锱蠦怶眤ࡹ鉉㡙憐暀ᤨᑗ靸ѐ愗坩墉ገ脔ဂ瑆圵鉑䥴ᅤ夕ᢓ瀘

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-16 23:55

Do pedos have privilege?

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-17 3:42

>>53
Societal taboos and expectations change over time. There's a reason why most of all societies do not eat fecal matter - people will get sick. There's a reason why most of modern societies outlawed involutary servitude. There's a reason why modern societies establish a rule of law that ought to be accountable to the rest of society.

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-17 4:53

>>57
People don't eat faecal matter because it tastes like shit.

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-17 4:55

THERE'S A REASON WHY MOST OF ALL SOCIETIES DO NOT EAT FECAL MATTER OUT OF MY ANUS

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-17 4:59

>>58
The point is about changes in human understanding, and how that affects taboo and behaviour. An example is our understanding about why society should live in the planet in understanding and sustainability as opposed to exploiting what we can for now with minimal regard to the ecological consequences.

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-18 18:53

>>60
Will glowball warming kill pedos? If so, I'm all for it.

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-18 20:37

>>61
Sadly it'll kill the rest of us non-paedos as well, I would imagine.

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-18 20:47

>>62
YES BUT THINK OF THE CHILDREN!!!!!

Name: pedobear 2012-06-18 21:04

>>63
i do ;)

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-18 23:05

How many children will be raped when you take the cp away from the pedos?

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-18 23:12

>>65
Zero. Pedos will no longer rape children without cp.

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-18 23:39

>>66
Why?

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-19 0:10

>>67
Common sense takes over and the world will be a better place.

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-19 0:23

>>68
But common sense is locale-dependent!  What's next, are you going to tell me morality is relative and not based upon logic and science?

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-19 0:50

>>69
Exactly, the world will be a better place without cp.

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-19 11:57

䢘攧唹∷杉匲䆈䐱唡՗ឈ餷⒃剑瑤顓䥃萃☁鐨靀阀䔩餱嚑茗榕ᤲ䊓ᦗ锰鞖錒艱䥀㦉╤馒颀莐録↉㑱≒攒剄ᄂ撀顅䅶匥錧戙礒獆⒂刅掕ㆀ厔⥒掇杶北怦䡸䉩ㄡ吰㙒儖餙䐅捳䡥戵鑑睷煗ܐ攔∕ᜁ楆摢㈈獑圡㦔杀摂ᘠ䙠㚆饆䠷兵ᤱ栖࠷ᐁ❐䂙ᅱ╒䤀塢瞆䔶楐㐐瀳᝗鍄ጱ✁Ą匱䈶圠攐̡捹砙䥃傓ᄵ‘ၗՀ攢堀灒䚃鐴灈炗摢礔戵ܶ㙵鐄恢ࡓ㡐阧蘶劀㑩䙘℔㥂閕䚆㈗蜱ᔘȆ木㊈螉䙑ቂ䙒莗т煩璉ၙ悆⥥腅፲噆墅ᘀी㦁⎖䘦䠱灇℧晈脀䅓唈鐠❡噩ᝢȕ䦒䝣杧፥ၖখ坧ᐷᥡㄡ牣瞃鞄蝒愒❗蔥䎀㡃靠㍳Ѱ圴㤣䘨ԇ䚒颇䡵ނ᝘♨圩⥨锘㡦咐ᅈ霂捕ሗ閖蜗琨桳䁲ᠹᥳⅷॣ䡅砢舡ℨ㘄⊑甸犙蕈ኆ唙蔉鈷艒ᥦ鑓ᖗ䔲፠䁐靲嚈茆然鑧䄩甔㙘摓瀧Ű眴璂㝱夅%䂄卢蒒ሩ褱摓荘炒✣ࢇ嘷ↆ香ᕀʃ╂㦙၄酖蠁虘

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-23 23:01

I <3 lolies!

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-24 6:20

Why do you care?

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-24 15:39

Websites don't rape children. Defacing some Tor site wont reverse what mapped nor will prevent future rapes. If you want to help the community volunteer in some social service. Your childish rage hurts nobody but yourself.

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-24 15:43

Hacker Without a Cause

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-25 9:18

>>74
Websites don't rape children.
Not yet, but I'm working on it.

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-25 10:29

>>74
Demand for new content does.

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-25 11:28

>>77
Child molesters would continue to rape children, whether they had an audience or not.

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-25 12:20

҃ဦֈᡉ朰䆐䁧⠡螕鞄هၑ虁͸ॢ虅圠锘捓䈄ऩ⊖❐袉餥衠䉉蔀㌡ㅶ鑈扆爵䌂饦怄䄐⠥ţょ耀葘㑸瞑嚕厐餘‖᥅㚀㒒硩斖挀猦㤆砷ᕘ虦朄ጤā㒔`倇鄥霳陷▓䅳♢耉㘙礐錹閗钉頗ᄱ⑖ᑱ煕㜶ᅴ〤撑摵袙በ獲失☶蕙ѷ㐗ㅂ瘠蜱傐㜧堉䍁䖈ᢔ⠠督睰Ā冈┣ݲ鍹▗ថሁᄩ攲唶蜃ش嘣ࠣ㙔唷㡒ᐗͧ楘馗鑈嘡࠲厄撃灰গ゘葲皘≤ᜃ愖灂琒祰䤹敤堔遱ɵ≐朱䍸锃蘦⤐॥ѧ申灉㔅̘傄桢ᑈࠠू㜣⎅㐉䎐㍖ࡧ夂蠖味鐗捥䍉膓鄴ᤡ㎇ቱ墑ࠥ㐒䌳芀ᆅ劁ፉ襤猖╴ࡓ酗ȧ搄啁ဩ♡㡀艳葶䀥⁰☧∗饠砀睅⢁〖奴⍳玕㌖≶␢畕䁳劉ᡆ䉹≒抇啕ፀ枇ᑰ瑦锔璕吙搇㜗ᄶ䚗㈖ࡂᘔ⊑㍶艕杂扔䄑喗咃周鞈䍖刕瀘桂ш芁愖癳堵灖ᜒ‰楒ᜡ䍃剩㝳䎖㦈鞂栧ɇ䒕́照℣㤩㠈㑤杴ᒅ慥螕蕈㠡㝢銃䡡ᡸ琧呱䀕倖Ű料礩炇

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List