How would I go about writing a virus that takes down CP websites? I know C and perl, but I've never written a virus or done any Greyhat things before. I'm not asking for a tutorial, but just a few pointers in the right direction to start learning.
Thanks in advanced for the advice.
Name:
Anonymous2012-06-14 18:40
Things you will need:
- A botnet, to attack the sites without fear of retaliation.
- A vulnerability scanner capable of operating within your botnet, with a design that allows for distributed, parallel operations, unreliable nodes, and that is scalable.
- A machine vision component that is capable of scanning images and videos for underage forms with a fairly high accuracy rating.
- Some sort of mutating infection vector that defies detection and removal. Your nodes will need to be operating for a very long time, so you can't risk one going down in the middle of an operation.
- Vulnerabilities in encryption cyphers such as AES-256 or enough computing power to crack them.
Name:
Anonymous2012-06-14 18:41
Why would you want to get rid of CP?
Name:
Anonymous2012-06-14 18:54
"Stopping the spread of CP" is impossible, you should think how to stop child abuse: that's the real problem
also I think you are in the wrong place dude
>>1 >>2-san's suggestions are a good starting point, but the most important component is social engineering; if the paedophiles set up and use a perfectly secure network, you won't be able to do anything solely through technical means.
>>2 A botnet
Attacking public sites directly isn't necessarily a good idea, unless you can manage to take control and get a hold of the server logs (to publish them). Some of the public sites might even be honeypots, so attacking them might be counterproductive.
A machine vision component
But then you need to train it with some actual CP, which is illegal to acquire or possess regardless of the motives. Not a good idea unless you work as part of a police force or something.
Vulnerabilities in encryption cyphers such as AES-256 or enough computing power to crack them.
Forget about it. The best you can get is a flaw in the implementation, not in the actual ciphers used.
>>3
Because it supports child abuse, which in turn destroys lives and causes life-long psychological trauma to the affected. Even if it's a public site, the ads serve to pay for more, and in third-world countries a few dollars might be enough to create another victim.
Name:
Anonymous2012-06-14 19:16
Your better off fighting the pedos, not the equipment. Get them to talk about things that will get them locked up.
Name:
Anonymous2012-06-14 19:29
I hate CP, but it keeps drawing me back. I'm sick /prog/. Help me.
Name:
Anonymous2012-06-14 19:31
lulz
Name:
Anonymous2012-06-14 19:40
>>6
There are no ads on CP sites. There are no commercial CP sites. That's fucking retarded. Only old people buy CP and that's on VHS from the mafia.
How would I go about writing a virus that takes down the websites of people who want to take down CP websites?
Name:
Anonymous2012-06-15 13:04
Censorship of information is bad. Information that contains naked children should be censored.
I agree that child porn, like regular porn, screws up people who use it, but I don't try to restrict people from distributing such material. Find other ways to discourage people from using child porn without contradicting your own ethics, you confused morons.
Name:
!L33tUKZj5I2012-06-15 15:42
>>2 - A botnet, to attack the sites without fear of retaliation.
This is the preferred way of doing it.
But another way to look at it is this - all the coonections just need to be coming from different IPs. So you can use proxies.
Taking down a server...just overloading how many open connections they allow. Windows is a bit lame for this unpatched, there's something like only 135 connections you can open at once...or at least it was after xp sp1, not sure whther it still is. Probably is.
But on linux, you can open as many as you want. Just open loads of page loads through loads of different proxies, you can overload the server and make it unaccessible. Any fule can do it.
Name:
Anonymous2012-06-15 16:35
>>26
DDoSing through proxies just DDoSes the proxies, you shithead.
>>27 DDoSing through proxies just DDoSes the proxies, you shithead.
If you send the entire flood through one proxy, then yes. But if each connection is going through a different proxy, no. ``faggot''
Name:
Anonymous2012-06-15 17:20
>>29
The appropriate term is ``sick fuck''. And yes, I know. I am a very, very bad person.
Name:
Anonymous2012-06-15 17:34
As mentioned, the best way to do this is through social engineering. You will have to infiltrate some paedo circles, but you can be sure the authorities will do a better job than you can.
First, you need a DNA sequencer, so you can find a specimen that is close enough, and also so you can find the pedo gene in humans. Then you have to alter the virus to only infect pedos and either cure them or kill them.
Name:
Anonymous2012-06-15 18:25
Pedophilia is not a choice, but pedophobia is!
Name:
Anonymous2012-06-15 18:30
>>36
Eat my slimy nutsax yeast jelly, pedocunt. You and your ilk will never be accepted. Just kill yourself.