John Carmack and Sepples

Today, I do firmly believe that C++ is the right language for large, multi-developer projects with critical performance requirements, and Tech 5 is a lot better off for the Doom 3 experience.
--John Carmack

http://twitter.com/ID_AA_Carmack/statuses/26560399301

COMMENCE SEPPLES THREAD

>>15
that question is not answerable because the question is wrong. it assumes that OO and STL were something that was added to C but not part of C. The OO in C++ is an extention of what is already C, the fact that structs have to be defined as a static template rather than just declared and used like arrays is what makes C statically object oriented. The OO in Java, Python, etc is not implemented statically, objects are dynamically allocated. People dont understand this, they program with OO in C++ like its Java and fuck up. There is really no OO in C++, its just C extended to work in a OO way.