>>18
I don't see why you would use an old compiler that only has binaries for DOS when there are modern compilers, like GCC, which have binaries for modern platforms.
I suppose if you're stuck with an operating system like MS-DOS you wouldn't have much of a choice regarding which compiler you select, so Turbo C would be a decent option in this particular case. But emulating a DOS environment in order to run Turbo C on modern platforms is nuts, particularly when there are alternatives like Code::Blocks which have native binaries for modern platforms and come with compilers which implement later versions of C.