I believe object-orientation is dated

I don't know how many advances might be happening recently on some underground Smalltalk mailing-list, but in general, OOP has remained the same for decades.

Does everybody think it's good enough? Does nobody want new features that will make your code more expressive somehow? Watcha think?

>>7
It's an observation. There are too many things to do if we spend time analysing the tools we use. This is why there we focus our efforts on a couple of disciplines: theoretical computer science, software engineering, electrical engineering, computer engineering, IT administration, etc. It's quite possible to create all sorts of tabulated data regarding the tools we use, but that sort of work is generally a theoretical field of study. People do theoretical work so that other people can take the lessons of that study and solve practical problems with it.