I believe object-orientation is dated

I don't know how many advances might be happening recently on some underground Smalltalk mailing-list, but in general, OOP has remained the same for decades.

Does everybody think it's good enough? Does nobody want new features that will make your code more expressive somehow? Watcha think?

>>58
large projects like e.g. game engines
Hah!
Game engines are almost by definition not large projects. They get written quickly by a small group of people, comprise relatively little code (except when compared to your factorial or bubble sort implementations, I guess), and don't have to consider long-term maintenance at all.

Game development is easy; that's why there's so much crap out there. If web developers didn't exist, game developers would be the very bottom of the hierarchy.