I believe object-orientation is dated

I don't know how many advances might be happening recently on some underground Smalltalk mailing-list, but in general, OOP has remained the same for decades.

Does everybody think it's good enough? Does nobody want new features that will make your code more expressive somehow? Watcha think?

>>34
I'm certain it could be done.  Actually, the question I have is what makes this a benefit and will an interpreter and/or a compiler care?