I believe object-orientation is dated

I don't know how many advances might be happening recently on some underground Smalltalk mailing-list, but in general, OOP has remained the same for decades.

Does everybody think it's good enough? Does nobody want new features that will make your code more expressive somehow? Watcha think?

>>13

Yeah, some functional functions are really interesting, and I like mixing imperative languages with them. It's really bliss. But that doesn't really solve object-oriented programming problems (they solve and express algorithmic stuff really neatly, but it's completely unrelated to object-oriented architectures, which is what I'm aiming).