I believe object-orientation is dated

I don't know how many advances might be happening recently on some underground Smalltalk mailing-list, but in general, OOP has remained the same for decades.

Does everybody think it's good enough? Does nobody want new features that will make your code more expressive somehow? Watcha think?

>>10

There are lots of wildly different paradigms for wildly different problem domains. But not so much overlapping (you'd have noticed if you really read that page). Are you telling me the amount of information on that page scares you so much you believe it's *gotta* have all the solutions to all the problems I might have encountered?

You'll notice... if you look closely, that I'm talking about OOP here, and stuff close by (Aspect-oriented programming, for one). The philosophy of functional programming won't help me (much); so that cuts a lot of possibilities, and the remaining ones I at the very least know the philosophy... but it also didn't help. That's why I'm talking about enhancing OOP.