Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

Linux C/C++ IDE

Name: Anonymous 2012-04-23 15:23

Good evening,

been using Geany under Ubuntu since I started studying Business Informatics. Now being in the second semester our classes changed from C to C++ and I found that Geany isn't so good for C++ because it lacks a decent auto-completion (e.g. member functions of STL are not shown).
Does anyone know a light IDE with decent auto completion?

Name: Anonymous 2012-04-23 15:26

codeblocks, or devcpp

I was looking for the exact opposite thing you did, thanks.

Name: Anonymous 2012-04-23 15:27

Save for how much autocompletion sucks, even in its absolute best implementation (MS IntelliSense), no, I don't think there's a single C++ IDE with any sort of half-way decent auto completion.

What you SHOULD do as a programmer is read the documentation

Name: Anonymous 2012-04-23 15:34

What >>3 said.

You could still check out QtCreator, KDevelop and Eclipse. They're decent, but I still prefer Emacs and a shell.

http://qt.nokia.com/products/developer-tools

Name: Anonymous 2012-04-23 15:46

Thanks for your replies, I think I'll give QtCreater a try.

Name: Anonymous 2012-04-23 15:46

Eclipse is the way to go.

Name: Anonymous 2012-04-23 15:48

vim+clang_complete

Name: Anonymous 2012-04-23 17:01

Linux is a C IDE and you're a moron. Stop trying to reinvent the wheel inside a single application.

Name: Anonymous 2012-04-23 17:04

>>8
What he said.

Name: Anonymous 2012-04-23 18:38

>>8
that is retarded on so many levels

Name: Anonymous 2012-04-23 18:49

QtCreator, do it

Name: Anonymous 2012-04-23 19:26

>>8
Linux is a colonel, silly anonymous.

Name: Anonymous 2012-04-23 19:43

Eclipse isn't lightweight but it does work.

Name: Anonymous 2012-04-23 20:52

>>10
No u.

>>13
Except when it crashes, which is often. Or when it becomes so slow that it's impossible to type, which is all the time.

Name: Anonymous 2012-04-23 22:27

codeblocks, now get out and be a healthy and productive human being

Name: Anonymous 2012-04-24 2:39

>>14
I don't know what you're doing wrong but my two year old Lenovo x100e runs Eclipse whenever I do Clojure.

Name: Anonymous 2012-04-24 4:58

emacs; not technically lightweight and not technically a C++ IDE.
http://cx4a.org/software/gccsense/

Name: Anonymous 2012-04-24 9:47

codelite is worth looking at.
eclipse is shit

Name: Anonymous 2012-04-24 12:20

Linux is retarded.

Visual Studio is what professionals use.

Name: Anonymous 2012-04-24 13:00

>>19
Your troll is weaker than your anus.

Name: Anonymous 2012-04-24 13:14

>>20
Most professional C++ devs use it everyday. Keep thinking your freeshit IDE or glorified notepad is any better, though.

Name: Anonymous 2012-04-24 13:20

gVim

Name: Anonymous 2012-04-24 14:44

Good god, why is this thread still going?

Name: Anonymous 2012-04-24 15:06

>>1
Kate4.

Name: Anonymous 2012-04-24 16:59

>>19-21
Linux isn't retarded, but VS is what most professionals use.  Most professionals are actually retarded, though, in a loose sense of the word "retarded."  Their intellectual growth has been "retarded" or "obstructed" by being forced to develop for the most popular platform.  If you're lucky enough to have the freedom to choose any target OS and development platform, then use Linux and emacs and enjoy your simplified life.

Name: Anonymous 2012-04-24 18:07

>>25
emacs
oh fuck off

Name: Anonymous 2012-04-24 18:39

>>25
I seriously hope you don't think Emacs is better than VS.

Name: Anonymous 2012-04-24 19:12

>>27
I seriously hope you don't think VS is better than Notepad.exe.

Name: Anonymous 2012-04-24 19:30

autocompletion?

in my days i had to browse a printed used guide and a printed, huge, reference book

Name: Anonymous 2012-04-24 19:31

s/used/user/

Name: Anonymous 2012-04-24 21:58

>>28
I seriously hope you're not using notepad instead of good old edit.com

Name: Anonymous 2012-04-24 22:01

>>29
didn't your generation invent cobol?

Name: Anonymous 2012-04-24 23:02

>>28
Then it follows that even notepad.exe is better than Emacs, since VS is better than Emacs.

Name: Anonymous 2012-04-25 2:31

>>33

>better than Emacs
>VS

pick one.

fail dubs bro.

Name: Anonymous 2012-04-25 2:55

>>33
Yes.

Name: Anonymous 2012-04-25 3:46

>>2-6
>>8-21
>>23-35
You are faggots.

Name: Anonymous 2012-04-25 4:21

Emacs
Gnus do their best now and are preparing.
Please watch warmly until it is ready.

Name: Anonymous 2012-04-26 12:38

editors are overrated. punched cards ftw!

Name: Anonymous 2012-04-26 18:10

I use vim (minimally configured), my terminal emulator, coreutils, and a tiling WM to do everything. No graphical file manager, no IDE autocomplete, etc.

Is it the most efficient way to work? No.
Do I find myself wishing I had a decent C/Lua autocompleter for Vim? Yes, and I'm sure there already are a few.
Could I eliminate most of my switches from Vim to terminal emulators if I studied Vim commands just a little bit more? Probably.

What I do get with this setup is an incredibly simple working environment that never gets in my way, even if it often refuses to lend a helping hand.

Name: Anonymous 2012-04-26 19:50

>>39
I probably will get raped in the ass for posting this on /prog/ but
last year I did this video about Vim and autocomplete http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vk285Zc5_Zw
The list of plugins I'm currently using and my vimrc can be reached at https://github.com/pera/vim
Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List
All trademarks and copyrights on this site are owned by their respective parties. All comments and posts are the responsibility of their own posters.
- Tinychan + 2ch Mode -