>>37
Lord you guys are dense, just take
>>25 bytecode proposition and you could let JS itself be interpreted arbitrarly by compiler code defined in said bytecode. If you want MyJS 2.0 to fix issues you have with JS, then go a head and implement it, there wouldn't be any standardization issues. Let your implementation be part of your site or what ever. Same with HTML5,6,..., just implement parsers and renderers in bytecode, publish it anytime you want. No standardization just pure competition. Siteprogrammers would use any bytecode libraries they'd fancy to use, if not writing their own. Sadly you have no idea what I'm talking about.