Why aren't you using Plan 9?


      __
     (  \
 __   \  '\
(  "-_ \ .-'----._
 '-_  "v"         "-
    "Y'             ".
     |                |
     |        o     o |
     |          .<>.  |
      \         "Ll"  |
       |             .'
       |             |
       (             /
      /'\         . \
      "--^--.__,\_)-'

The only thing it's missing is drivers for modern hardware, but it will run great on a VM or a free computer found on the side of the road.

The GUI is simple and beautiful, and once you get over the fact that it's NOT UNIX it's really nice to use.

Ͱၘ᠀皃阩鉢₄唶扩࠴ᡳ⥤愄玉膈㠗硳唑村鈴杉靧攘䦉⠵ᡖ酡ᚔ錵ᔢゕも⒒᜙㊙週䅤᜹醆⠷塧Α㢁畒ܕ㐓耔吡䉥ᕀ朷⠣॰гጠ䜴䦃⒑睱ʅ瀧䂂爗艕ė㞆閉蔗᜵虹ㅱ呴ᖀ㍹隇戂ᐵ榕午変Ťᔂ呶≰畴炈皘錶∀偨蝨㎂v⢆怀耕䡇⒃ኒؤᐡ炇悙∤块ኇ螅救剓耴外硘嚁䌂ᘈɕᑔ〢鈂ᐴ卦Ҁ蔈⠠爈㥡ぁᚉ摔睑嘓靉㍴䘓䚉ॉ鑠Ↄ舖䡣袒銀悅圹憒ࠢ႘℣䉑䑁䥑邔㔷奣劐遄ऄ顒餉焇▐瑁⎖ᄐ蕥啈慗玔匡荵‰ݷᠸ㜅荑镰靈㐢ᐨ戙蝁䑃题桃靕ԩ逇梉䠸㤑—琘٧眩撆嚐ʈ夁甂蠠焦ऐ䤣ᡧᖑ啓備其栃鈧攢搦堶禀鄆☈䜒扳ጵ禓▀隄㠅邖͆则嚆慥靶霐甥䅒坓ႆ呒❔㎔ㄆ鈑ޑ鎗ጴ舄蝤䕔嘙

C++ is a good language. It is not a perfect language because it inherits from C. C is a flawed language where many things are left undefined. C is an ancient artifact that serves no purpose outside of the domain of kernel design. Because of the improvements made upon C to form C++, beginning programmers and veteran programmers alike may be led astray, thinking that modern C usage is a good idea. It is a mistake to believe the success of C++ justifies the continued use and popularity of C. Just because C++ is successful does not mean the language it has inherited from is of high quality.