>>19
No, I meant the hard part is making the code understandable for someone else. My code would be indecipherable even with comments, and I don't want to write a fucking thesis for everything I do.
You may, however, be right in the sense that coding for society could let me improve my (inadequate) social skills, and make me think more objectively.
Still, the idea of arguing with people disgusts me. Why? Because I would run into conversations like this:
Them: Why did you set the variable to 2.7329 instead of 2.0 or some other exact variable?
Me: So that when the program has iterated millions of times through this recursive loop and I get an exact result, it's less likely to be due to the inherent nature of the number 2 or some other accidentally implemented concept, but due to the emergent properties of the loop.
Them: Inherent nature of number 2? What the shit?
Me: Or something like that.
Them: You don't have a clue what you are doing, do you? You're fucking fired, you retarded faggot. Go spout your technobabble somewhere else.