>>20
I'm not claiming this guy has a degree in psychoanalysis. In fact it's entirely possible the whole thing is fake. However it is interesting to read something from the opposite point of view to what you're usually
allowed to read, and plenty of what it says is true. Those magazines did exist. People did used to have sex with children. All this stigma is relatively recent. These are the kind of things people know but are afraid to speak up about.
Again I don't support child molestation or anything of the sort, but I think people should break the taboo and do more research. Perhaps legalizing the
existing materials could be beneficial. I am not into children, but I do have a fetish for attractive women, and I think without pornography I would have raped at least four or five people by now. Perhaps it's the same for many pedophiles who cannot contain themselves.
Of course, none of this should really apply to lolicon. Demonizing lolicon and bundling it in with 3D CP is just plain stupid and goes against everything the politicians and soccer moms are complaining about with
real child pornography.