The Haskell haters' fallacies

1. Haskell is purely functional.
No.

2. Static typing sucks.
No.

3. Haskell is hard to learn.
Go scrub another toilet you mental midget.

4. You go scrub another toilet you mental midget!
Ergo you're wrong, bitch.

>>38
Except that transpose you did there takes some time, so it's not equivalent solution. The CL solution or the trivial Haskell solution I showed only need to traverse the list of vectors once.

And as I said, if you want to use something that at least resembles standard syntax of the language for addition, you have to use ugly hacks and you still have some $ build there that serve nothing obvious from the point of whoever will read the code.

Haskell is ugly as fuck and limits its users in many ways, therefore it shouldn't be used by anyone.
Oh, wait, it isn't.