.

There are no good C-like interpreted languages, /prog/. I plan to design a new language with the following features:

* C-like in syntax
* statically typed, not dynamically typed
* strongly typed, not weakly typed
* interpreted in the main implementation, but compilers are possible
* functions are first class objects
* classes, none of that duck typing shit
* basic data structures like vectors, lists, etc. are included, unlike in C
* templates for generic programming

>>34
>more suitable for application development

Why? Because it's slower, has GC (presumably) and has no GUI toolkits (yet)? Although I do suppose the lack of a compile cycle will be a definate benifit.

I don't mean it can't be good or better than any alternative, but I am failing to see enough benifit to use it.

Wow me.