.

There are no good C-like interpreted languages, /prog/. I plan to design a new language with the following features:

* C-like in syntax
* statically typed, not dynamically typed
* strongly typed, not weakly typed
* interpreted in the main implementation, but compilers are possible
* functions are first class objects
* classes, none of that duck typing shit
* basic data structures like vectors, lists, etc. are included, unlike in C
* templates for generic programming

A wise man once said ``If a programming language doesn't make you think about programming in a completely different way, you shouldn't learn it''.

If you don't make this language worthwhile, op, it will die extremely fast. Emulating C, even with improvements, is not enough to attract users (even if that's not exactly what you're intending to do).