.

There are no good C-like interpreted languages, /prog/. I plan to design a new language with the following features:

* C-like in syntax
* statically typed, not dynamically typed
* strongly typed, not weakly typed
* interpreted in the main implementation, but compilers are possible
* functions are first class objects
* classes, none of that duck typing shit
* basic data structures like vectors, lists, etc. are included, unlike in C
* templates for generic programming

>>22
I would prefer bytecode interpreted, but mostly because I'm in the middle of writing a bytecode VM.

Also, a nice feature would be type inference. Then people might actually see some form of advantage over the more mature, more widely used, faster, yet more verbose C. Who cares if it brings it closer to Python, this is one of the reasons Haskell is so powerful; it is statically typed by inference makes it so much easier.