Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

.

Name: Anonymous 2012-02-03 21:40

There are no good C-like interpreted languages, /prog/. I plan to design a new language with the following features:

* C-like in syntax
* statically typed, not dynamically typed
* strongly typed, not weakly typed
* interpreted in the main implementation, but compilers are possible
* functions are first class objects
* classes, none of that duck typing shit
* basic data structures like vectors, lists, etc. are included, unlike in C
* templates for generic programming

Name: Anonymous 2012-02-03 22:34

Wow, OP. What a great spec. You got some really big words in there like "syntax" and "statically".

Nothing about dynamic or lexical scope, closures, continuations, co-routines, dynamic dispatch, higher-order functions, modules, functors or monads, but you're off to a great start.

I mean "pointers", that's just WOW.

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List